Features
Spotlight
Features
Featured Forums
Brand Forums
Lifestyle
Resources
ios

Horological Meandering: As I said, unless there is a specific reason.

I don't know your watch. If in any doubt go forward.
1d
By: Rapwatch
0

Horological Meandering: Unless there is a specific reason to only advance, it is preferable to take the short route

to your desired time to minimise wear on the cannon pinion. Using the drag here to stop non-hacking movements also does no damage. So do not worry friends, none of you have done any damage/wear by winding backwards. R P.S. I checked and yes, FPJ instruction manual says, "strongly recommended not to
1d
By: Rapwatch
1

Patek Philippe: I prefer the aesthetic simplicity of the regular buckle.

Personally I find the excessively ornate and showy PP symbol on the deployant very jarring.
2d
By: Rapwatch
0

Glashütte Original: Why make it look like another Oyster copy?

What on earth are they thinking?
6d
By: Rapwatch
1

Patek Philippe: Ouch. They just downgraded you to pins?!

Totally unacceptable in my view. That is not the original spec of the watch. Pins. Yuk. I'm with you, this is why I have no interest in Nautilus since. The other issues are unacceptable too. It's all your property. Just get a Lange. Much better attention. I think PP are just too bloated and arrogant
6d
By: Rapwatch
1

Patek Philippe: yep [nt]

8d
By: Rapwatch
0

F.P. Journe: I just had the chance to try it

Not mine...... yet maybe
14d
By: Rapwatch
0