WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Breguet

Far from debunked actually

 

The current approach to debunk is actually as flawed as to ask an accused if they committed the crime. "I asked Breguet and they said nothing’s changed”….
The best outcome should be that Breguet considers there may have been a slip up and pieces went out unfinished, contacts the owners and checks if they are to standard. I’ve seen plenty of mistakes like this over the years and stamping feet like an angry toddler in denial is, well, embarrassing.
This is ‘blackbox' mindset. Repeatedly stating something doesn't make it correct. This is now sadly descending into attacking someone and obfuscating their facts to some bizarre agenda knowing full well that person can't be bothered to return to rebut and defend here.
Using scientific terms like ‘falsifiable’ requires knowing how to use them correctly. The statement to test is ‘all 777qs have internal anglage’; (Your grey market piece is not really relevant here, but it does serve as likely older stock.)
The facts are that a previously lauded and entirely trustworthy member of this community (with no agenda to lie as disgustingly implied) reported at least two pieces in the wild that have no angles. No a question of differences of opinion on anglage or 'style'. No internal angles. Thus ‘all 777qs have internal anglage’ is falsified.
Fin

Locked login to reply