My Posts

It's in the safe at the moment and I don't think I took any proper pictures of it back then, so I'll have to remember digging it next time and post here...

A wristshot, even from 20cm far ? I think any watch even at this level will show some degree of 'flaws' when you zoom in at X20...

The max you zoom in, the more you will find 'flaws'. I just think you went too deep in magnification. Unless these are 100% machine made, you must accept some 'flaws' here and there. AFAIAK, it looks acceptable, especially the 'scratch' on the dial

On that first picture, the alpha hands match the stamped-numerals dial I believe. Although the version is not the same one as in the brochure, I have seen a couple in this exact config (which looks great BTW)

I used to own the prequel to the electrochron. I don't thnik it had a name. mayme manuochron would be fitting ! It lacked the electric arc styling cues in the second hand and logo, but the glorious hour hand is there

and the information is : it is fake. All the way. not even a mariage Watch.

This Pocket Watch is an 8-day movement, and the little window indicates the power reserve (in days) which in the current state is down hence the red indicator

I don't remember ever seeing the arrow-stylized-f futurematic on any dial other than the porthole (and I have seen quite a few ! )

I can appreciate that you like your watch and that you spend nice moments with it. But knowing it was 'fully restored by the manufacture' back then is quite a disgrace. This is clearly not right in any standard for a manufacture to restore a watch so outside of its original specifications (which I w