You have nailed it Tyler! We went on a bit more and found it looping around the definition. And in the end, the SC is great in every sense, you are absolutely correct. It's not so much the definition of accuracy but a matter of differentiating accuracy and precision. We kept the debate going because
So as we were talking about this fine chronometer (my friend is in love with it), we stumbled upon a debate that have lasted us forever but we haven't agreed on anything. For me, it's not a matter of opinion so would like to seek advice here. First of all, I have to say I echo some of the comments h
Initially it was just upsetting to see, then the questions popped up as to why they would do it. To save money? It'd save so little in comparison to this bad press. If we think they are a fashion brand (i don't) then this is exactly what they should avoid. Is rolex a fashion brand too? I guess so. B
but I agree they focused on the wrong thing! catching on the case size, case shape etc only makes it look like a replica or a wannabe. but catching onto good design traits and ideas will open up endless variation.
similar age, similar path in watch taste. I don't have the knowledge to pick out icons. and going in full circle...like many have mentioned, why would I care if it were anyone else's icon. As long as it speaks to me, both aesthetically and in terms of movement, then it could well be my icon. part of