Freak

Watch out, people! Take care. And . . . enjoy!

Another fresh and not too bad shot of this Freak of mine. Needless to say how much I love it... Best, Nicolas

What immediately came to my mind was the new Ulysse Nardin Super Freak, which I became very interested in after seeing and wearing it during Watches & Wonders. It seems to follow a somewhat similar idea: two tourbillons working together through an ultra-s

Got to try the Freak One yesterday. Surprisingly easy to wear for my small 16cm wrist! It is of course a large watch but I think anything called the Freak is not meant to be a hidden under the cuff dress watch! I still prefer the Cruiser and Out designs t

Why? Because, from my perspective, so many things simply come together here: the construction, the fresh idea behind it, the beautiful design, and also the fair price-to-value proposition. I had the chance to see the watch during Watches and Wonders, and

In my opinion, this one is hard to beat. Best, Nicolas

Spend 15 minutes with it and it is mesmerising… The technical achievement, the execution and the coolness factor blow you away. Also the cool „revolving“ small seconds is quite something, but good eyesight is required. But who cares about time if you have

After having seen and worn the watch in person during Watches & Wonders, I have to admit: I was genuinely blown away. This is not a “rational” watch anymore. And honestly, I don’t even think it is really about timekeeping in the traditional sense. UN took

My wrist is about the same (6 3/4"). The Freak fits great for me, but I do have a very flat wrist. If you have a rounder wrist, it will hang off on the ends, but the short lugs do help.

If yes, could you also indicate your wrist circumference? I know chances are perhaps slim, but before taking a long journey to have a look at the watch I just want to have a better idea of the proportions as that would be by far the biggest watch I would