Just for reference,my wrist measurement is 17- & from my prospective the size of the watch is not overpowering & the size is probably necessary considering what is around the base movement to make it work & at the same time having not to cramp the view of
even if the case is probably too large for my wrist. That said, I consider the new 6105G to be a major release. The modern aesthetic isn't my taste, but it's well made. And, from a horological standpoint, well, it's simply great (for me, at least). Best,
In my opinion, this 5102 is a killer. Class, elegant, with some good proportions even if I would have liked a 2 mm less big case ( just for having a better movement / case ratio ). Credit: Antiquorum. Especially compared to the no lug bigger and thicker C
...seems to have more depth to the dial and appears thinner. Although I'm surprised the current one is as thin as it is. Silly question: What if a customer wants to see the sky view from somewhere other than Geneva? I'm thinking of watches like the Jules
Patek Philippe just released a new Celestial watch: the ref. 6105G-001 . It is an upgraded and completely redesigned version of its two predecessors : ref. 5102 , introduced in 2002 , and ref. 6102 , introduced in 2012 . Let's have a look ! A/ THE NEW CEL
Not saying I'd buy it. But, when I first saw the new Celestial, I didn't like it. Now that I've seen it a few more times, I'm starting to warm up to it. It's very futuristic and very not-on-brand for Patek Philippe. But at the same time, some parts of it
A dream piece for me. The good points: - A superb case, 43 mm big, 9, 78 m high: Good proportions, even if it could be smaller. - A dial to die for, with these constellations and the moon located " above your head ". - A nice engraved side case. I am more
It does indeed! To anyone who’s browsing, this 5107g used to be celestialmoon5102’s - I know that he is selling a few more fine examples from the house of Patek. They’re unusual in that they have been very well looked after, so if you are after one of his