I fully agree on all counts, much prefer the quirkiness and small imperfections of the 5065a over the "smooth perfection" of the 5167 / 5165. When I collected my 5065 from the Patek NL service center earlier this year in person, the watchmaker erroneously
I have never been interested in women’s aqua notes. However, when my wife told me that, when I looked at her seriously and this model, it was called a size, a composite band, and a new clasp, a type that had never existed before. Moreover, it looks exactl
I do not think of it as a sports watch. To a non watch person it looks like a $50 watch. AND YET, I find to be utterly charming. I find the dial mesmerizing with its almost military look. It is super comfortable, has an incredible movement and is totally
Considering the watches you have, you could perfectly add both, Aquanaut and Calatrava, as they would complement nicely the existing ones. In the Calatrava range, I would also have a look at the 5196, it could fit your wrist better than the 6000 and you c
To me its the right size for an Aquanut. I think its even smaller than the 5165a which is 38 mm. The present 5167a is bigger at 40mm. Its a winner. And quite hard to find. Best wishes. Geross.
Isn't the 5165 that was discontinued a few years ago just a smaller version of the 5167? I agree that the Aquanaut is one of the most versatile watches in the PP collection, moreso than the Nautilus. It doesn't scream "Look at all the complications on thi