. . . I still haven't seen a CK 859 in the metal yet . . . possibly this weekend, if all goes according to plan. Joining you with a '53 ref 2667 today. Applied Ω symbol . . . . . . and loads of active radium on the dial. ☢️

. . . but here it is for your viewing pleasure, in no particular order. ['60 ref 2943 / cal 504] ['46 ref 2365 / cal 30T2SCrg] ['44 ref 2242 / 18 jewel 30T2SC] ['53 ref 2667 / cal 420] ['56 ref 2846 / cal 500] ['48 ref 2499 Centenary / cal 28.10 JUB] ['43

. . . made this case? Ca '53 Ω ref 2667, ~ 32 mm case. Distinctly smaller, but the lugs? Practically identical, René.

... which was a very hard decision to make I confess. Not only there were many many watches which deserved the title but also the many great entries received gave me (and I hope all our members) a lot of things to think about the meaning of "humble" when

. . . humblest, Omegas in my collection before viewing your theme thread, Abel. Ca '53 Ω ref 2667 . . . . . . powered by the obscure cal 420 movement. It's the sort of watch that's not on anyone's radar . . . there's nothing to interest an avid collector

. . . for that matter, so is the PADI. The best, though, is this unassuming . . . [ Ca '53 ref 2667 cal 420] . . . vintage Omega. Literally perfect . . . off a second per week .

. . . a vintage Ω today? [ ca '53 ref 2667 / cal 420] Out shortly to my cue-maker's shop for a few adjustments and a new tip . . . HAGWE, all! Art

. . . bender, K. Haven't been able to wander away from home since last Saturday. And obviously, not a drop to drink. [ Ca '53 Ω ref 2667, cal 420] Oh, well . . . at least there's next week to look forward to! ;-)

. . . ref 2667, ca '53. 33 mm of pure caffè latte pleasure!

. . . there's a few vintage Omegas in my collection light as the proverbial feather. [ ca '53 ref 2667 / cal 420] Best, Art