They should be regarded as such and will certainly always have a place in the brand's collection : same as the "Moonphase Speedmaster" for Omega or the Submariner for Rolex. This should however not prevent the brands from new design approaches : the Cubit
Mahesh showed us a good old Tourbillon, here is another one which made me dream, a lot, the Royal Blue Tourbillon. Here, a jeweled version. I much prefer the non jeweled one, I must confess. The case is cool, too. That was another great Ulysse Nardin! Bes
. . . but now that there's finally one in regular production, it's almost as though there's a new line of descent within a royal family. The original black CK 2915 bestowed its nobility on succeeding generations, while yours granted noble status to all it
One is perfect (39mm Jumbo) and all others fall in line to one degree or another. But definitely not the same. I would say the difference with these Chopards is larger. Same diameter cases? Everything about the other dimensions on the XPS are better.
It’s a real ship - Royal Caribbean Allure of the Seas - checked the name after zooming in on the image. Reason I’m crying laughing is despite my comments above we took a week’s cruise on this ship 5 years ago for the same friend’s 60th birthday. The good
Vintage is kind of stressful to own and honestly I love a lot of features modern watches have, like sapphire crystals, waterproofing, etc. I just sold all of my vintage pieces over the last 6 months. Didn’t have much but was not finding them as fun as my
I think it suffered a bit in comparison with the royal oak and nautilus. But with this model it has a more unique identity - the color of the ceramic case, the dial really make it stand out. The collaboration - it is nice, but not a decisive factor. I lov
most older watches have been at some point, and it’s less of a big deal for watches like this with gentle curves than for watches that originally had more defined edges (the Royal Oak is an extreme example). The question for you is whether it’s too polish