Even with a good lens, I didn't think it was possible to see that much gap between the dial and the hand. And captured with its shadow too! But Lange does make your photography easier : )
We are very critical when it comes to the accuracy of watches. We look at small fine details of watches in depth. Movement edges sharpness, font ink etc etc! And yet nearly everybody is fine with a watch that is wrong 50% of the time!! It would kill me! The WT function is not complete, and hence is
Of course, just my opinion. 1. Thinner bezel gives it more class. 2. I thought the lack of symmetry for the right hand side bezel protrusion would be a problem for most people, but when looking at it side by side with the PP.... well it is much more symmetrical than the nautilus. 3. It really stood
I knew it was always going to be difficult on the first look. Such a change. But I didn't hate it when it was released - thats always a good start! Press pics will never do it justice, so as more wristshots and real life pics emerged, it helped to form my opinion. Your shot alongside the Rolexes als
Are these pictures all the same watch? I noticed the first pic has a more creamy patina, maybe it is the lighting. Theese watches do not scream 'I AM A ROLEX' and yet they are undeniably 100% ROLEX!! (If that makes sense!)