This is a 217 serial number, my dad's is a 218

I did see the triangle eating into the rose because it was mentioned in this article: But I thought the text on the dials were the same. However, I've just realised that the text is not presented in the same order. My dad's is shock-resisting - depth - submariner, this is depth, submariner, shock-r

It sold at auction in 2015: www.the-saleroom.com

Firstly, let me assure you that this watch is genuine. It was left to my dad in 1983 by my grandad and had previously been left to him by his brother. I never thought for a moment that anyone on here would think this watch was fake and am mortified that this is the case. I fully admit that my first

It is his watch though, which is why I have become so interested in it and want to find out if this long-time family watch really is a unique 7923. I also thought that if it was a unique 7923 that people on here would want to know about it given the rarity of these watches. There is no doubt that it

The hands definitely aren't typical of the 7923 - but this is exactly what is making me think it is a unique version of the watch, possibly a prototype? Because the serial number is previous to the $100,000 ebay watch, then this watch must have been made earlier, and the ebay watch itself isn't a ty

But why do you think it's a risky business?

Given some of the very interesting and informative previous threads that I have found on this Board regarding the Tudor Submariner 7923, I thought people might be interested to see what I think might be a unique version of the Tudor Oyster SubMariner 7923. A picture of the watch is below and you can

My dad is selling his: mailchi.mp