Front Page

Both watches are 42mm. The primary differences that I can determine are the thickness of the bezel and the thickness of the case. The new version is listed as 42 mm by 12 mm thick while the original version was 42 mm by 11.2 mm thick. I think the size difference that people are referring to is there

XL last month. Your photos and commentary from the the fall of 2010 helped to push me over the edge as it were. (That and Jocke's enthusiasm and stunning photos of his). So far I am extremely pleased with the purchase. Its a great watch which shows lots of different faces under different lighting co

in height. The original PanoInverse XL was listed as 42 mm by 11.2 mm, while the new one is listed as 42 mm by 12.0 mm. Not sure why GO would opt to make it thicker but that's what it says. So it looks to me like the thinner bezel plus the extra thickness of the case dimension are the two main diffe

black Alligator strap. So if you go with the one from GO it should definitely fit. To my understanding the only thing that will be different between the short, regular, and long sizes is the length of the straps. This message has been edited by cubsfan on 2012-04-23 17:14:31

Here's a couple of quick shots. I am also extremely impressed with the quality of the GO strap.

I know many people like the grey nubuck strap that it normally comes with but for whatever reason that was the one thing about the watch that did not really appeal to me when I saw it in the flesh. I don't have a photo to post right now but will try to give it a shot later...

version. The white gold version has blued screws and blued power reserve indicator while the stainless steel version does not. I believe the stainless steel version has always had brushed sides (at least mine does). Does anyone know if GO is actually saying that this is a "new" version of the stainl