didn’t get sidetracked by inconsequential labels. And by the way historically 35mm was not only considered a men’s watch it was often referred to as being a large men’s watch. Eg the classic men’s Calatrava Ref 96 was only 31mm. The “large” version Ref 570 was 35 mm, same size as yours. Plus you get
relative bargain prices. I like the Calatrava case, dial layout, size and rose gold dial markers. Plus it is platinum. The fact that it is not popular I consider a plus because it is not commonly seen. Obviously, your decision is a personal one so I do not recommend what you should do. That said I l
the Banberry is for me by far the most complicated and compelling. The others simply have a blank where the moon would be and accordingly no leap year cycle indicated and no 2d hand. And thanks for pointing out the functionality of that 2d hand the functionality of which I was unaware. As an owner o
In general I prefer the much bolder, classical style Dauphine hands, like on 2499 4th series, 5396 and 5496, all watches with similar baton hour markers to those on your watch. However, while it does take a little getting used to, for me Patek got the hands right on this model. Two reasons: Aestheti
At this point the iconic 5396 whose antecedents include the legendary 2497/2438, is getting a little long in the tooth. Maybe it is time to retire it. If so, I think it deserves a special send off, namely a limited edition. While a T would be fantastic, can’t imagine Patek would do that. But how abo