Also, while this iteration certainly speaks to me, it is always possible that another model may speak to me more! But, then I think through it, and maybe something that is too on the nose might be a bridge too far! By way of example, this one evokes memories of my father and I playing billiards when
Seriously considering putting in for the 5089R-001 (ie, the RG billiards). There is something wonderfully brooding about that one - although it does not take itself too seriously. Still somewhat on the fence, although I have the support of my AD. It’s a challenge to commit when one has not see it in
$50,000, give or take, is a lot of money for any watch. In my view, the price is commensurate with what has gone into the watch. But that, of course, is a calculation only the purchaser can make!
But if you read the On the Dash interview, he interestingly distinguishes the Crash from the Mirage as the starting point for each watch was very different. It is a great read if you have the time.
When you add everything up it makes sense: Completely new, shaped movement. Completely new, shaped case. Interesting "complication" with inverted hand stack. Solid gold movement. Shaped hands. Etc.