Features
Spotlight
Featured Forums
IWC
Brand Forums
Lifestyle
Resources
ios

Rolex: Oooh very nice shot!

Thanks for adding it! You as well!
7M
By: Mostel
0

Rolex: Hi Nicolas

I know you are very intrigued by it! Hesitate not!
7M
By: Mostel
1

Rolex: NICE!!

Thanks for chiming in!
7M
By: Mostel
0

Rolex: Haha!

Thanks Patrick! I also thought it was FAR too big!! But the composition/balance is what makes it so remarkable. But my real 'share' here is how EXOTICALLY different it is from any other Rolex. And it took not wearing it for a good while to really comprehend it.
7M
By: Mostel
0

Independents: In this concept, yes for profit.

A person owns an object desired by many. But the person does not want to ever part with it. Yet the person can't help considering how to 'share' the object... and yes, be paid to share it. There must be far greater value objects, equally rare, that are leased... that's really the question of this th
7M
By: Mostel
2

Independents: Hey Jay

Yep. It may be too special ultimately. But with stringent vetting, it might be possible...
7M
By: Mostel
2

Independents: Yes M2

It seems that many collectors would want to do it... but it's just a conversation/idea at this juncture...
7M
By: Mostel
0

Independents: thanks

7M
By: Mostel
0

Independents: In this case, as a concept anyway--

ownership would not be an option. Just for conversation here...
7M
By: Mostel
0

Independents: So, without getting into pricing AT ALL--

The concept is, for a fee, you lease a watch that no one can 'get'. Insurance obviously plays a central role here, and, like leasing a supercar, or luxury apartment, credit checks etc are all mandatory. It's just a business concept, and wondered if anyone would ever consider leasing such an object--
7M
By: Mostel
1