My Posts

I can't argue with you when you say the 292 is too big for you. Personally, I went the opposite direction, i.e. moving from 42mm to 47mm. My wrist is small too but the 47 rad looks fine on my wrist. Unlike many other brands that enlarge their watches to suit the trend, Panerai has always been big hi

Deep down, I prefer 21 and 203 over 217 and 232, other vintage models are even better, but I don't feel right in paying exorbitant price for many in the Pam family. They are very very pretty in design but lack the technical substance to demand such high prices imho. Don't listen to me, I'm just a po

372 will be my next pam, to complement my 232. Can't wait.

It works fine so far. Pam098 is a unique piece. It may not be particularly popular among pam lovers, but that's exactly why I love it. Coz you rarely see it on the wrist of another person. Quite a conversation starter that suits both casual and formal wears. Many thought that it has got a GP movemen

What make the situation worse are speculatory buyers. They don’t necessarily enjoy the watches they buy. Some don’t even intend to wear them. Anticipating future price movements based on the popularity of certain models, as it is easy to spot the stars on forum like this, speculators buy watches in

but I'm sorry for those people who lack connections, as it will be a long wait for them even if they have put their name down for one.

Panerai must have been reading my mind and that of many Panerai affectionados when they come up with this design. Yes, the hands could be longer and they could have put a rolex movement in it (which I suspect they may do and make it a limited edition in the coming years), 372 has already fulfilled m

No message body

I'm a Rad lover and already have a Pam 98 and a 232. Having seen the pictures of the 338, I think it will be my next watch. The problem is, I must let go either the 98 or the 232 to finance the 338. I love them both. While I don't need to say much about the significance of the 232, the 98 is also a