Rolex

Because I have read it several times and the comments are a factor in my decision to pick up the black dial version of the 16519. In my opinion, the 16519 looks very very good with the black strap. Truth be told, I am not much of a bracelet guy, so the Da

damage / loosen the SEL. The 16519 gives me more peace of mind.

A couple 16520 shots for you to compare and contrast with the 16519.

And we'll also agree on our common preference for the 16520 over the Dayto 62xx... The Daytona fans will kill us for that, but hey, let's stay strong. Now, 16520 or 16519? I still have a preference for the 16520. I do hear you on the bracelet concern, whi

Before I begin, I want to say that the following is my opinion and mine only. Please feel free to disagree, and I have no doubt that many of you will. First, I view all Daytona models before 1989 (ie. pre-16520) as more functional watches, neither aesthet

very happy in the sun:) and it's a bloody good beater! Cheers Francois from Down Under

I have seen two at auction , one at antiquorum and one with christies However Rolex insist it is a white gold 16519 dial I am not convinced, firstly it is inverted 6 and they are not silver sub dials Interested in your opinion Here are more from auction:

Good morning. I have a Rolex Daytona 16519 (white gold) circa 1994, the dial is white with Arabic numbers at 1,2,4,5,7,8,10 and 11 while the sub dials surroundings are white gold colour. I really like the dial of the Daytona 16520 (steel) with "small bato