5218-202-A

A part of my collection, around 2005. These were great moments. From left to right: PAM 198, 249, Pre V Logo 5218-201/1, Mare 5218-301/A, Mare Slytech 5218-304, Marina Militare 5218-202/A, Daylight 5218-207/A, Marina Militare PAM 36. Enjoy, Nicolas

Panerai definitely did a great job with the PAM 5218. In my opinion, it is one of the most thrilling watch they made for these 15 last years, along with the 372, the 587, the 662 and some other impossible to find, such as the 1346 Guido Panerai & Figlio,

“ The “vintage” models like the Luminor ref. 5218-202/A were even more valuable; it cost a healthy, mid-five figures at the time. In fact, the ref. 5218-202/A cost more than an F.P. Journe Resonance at the time”

Thirty years chasing an ideal… Not the 5218-202/A Pre-V that started it all… not vintage… but the modern heir to its legend — the PAM05218. There would be no WSW, no deep dive into horology, maybe not even this entire collector’s journey, without that mor

I do think so. Best, Nicolas

2 killers Duo: Best, Nicolas

At the " reissue game", Panerai is very good. We can even say that when they revisit their past, they often do it in a very good way. There are a lot of references which are revisiting the past. The 372, the 587, the 662, the 127, the 21, the Mare Nostrum

From SJX: "Visually, the PAM05218 a faithful remake of the Luminor ref. 5218-202/A of 1993, a “Pre-Vendome” model that became one of the most desirable watches of the 2000s. The watch retains the same design and many of the details, including the “non mat

5218 and 2025, Not my picture

From let to right: PAM 198, PAM 249, Logo Pre V 5218-201/A, Mare Nostrum 301 and Slytech 304, Marina Militare 5218-202/A Non Matching, Daylight Slytech 218-207/A and Marina Militare PAM 36. I also had the 127 / 217, the PAM 40, the PAM 1 PreA and the 5218