The Everest will still remain a "if you know, you know" kind of watch. And collectors who know will be happy to pay for it. Similar to how the 2500V won't have any impact on the 2000V although I have to admit visually. material wise and mechanically, thos
Instaed, it's the 2000V. All the elegance of the Overseas line, without the bulkiness as it retains the original 1120 movement. It is the most elegant combination of the 222 and 3rd gen overseas. VC needs to quickly re-release this watch. This watch shoul
Comparing these exact models, I voted for the 222 in this showdown. There are Overseas models I prefer over the 222, but not the one they chose.. The Overseas Ultra Thin (2000V) that was released in 2016 with the Cal 1120 feels like the true spiritual suc
So we have Speedy Tuesday and FP Friday. What do we have for Thursdays? No idea what we can do to be more inclusive for everyone. Since today is Thanksgiving and I am so thankful for many things, I was lucky enough to receive a piece on time for "Tourbill
in response to another forum member‘s desire for the 2000V. His reply was, pretty much impossible to find. From what I heard, I‘d be surprised if the production was much more than a hundred. If you like thin, WG Overseas, your best bet may be the PC. Dani
But the proportions of the 2000v are better . The only thing I would really like to see is 1) a little bit thinner, closer to the 2000v 2) let the end links at the bracelet come in more instead of flaring out so much. That’s mainly for me though as my wri
It’s also difficult to compare it with 5711 and 15202 because, IMO, it follows a different approach. It’s more robust and sporty. The 2000v comes closer to 5711 and 15202 but is available only in WG (so far). Having said this, the 4500v is a great daily w
I find the Royal Oak 15202 slightly more appealing. However I‘m someone who stays away from hype and lot liked designs, thus I can focus more on actual watchmaking, which is where the Overseas excels at in comparison to it‘s contenders. To answer you ques