. . . had forgotten about this current British military Seamaster, Nicolas. If it's an issued piece there can't be many in circulation. Your chances of finding an issued ref 165.024 . . . [watch credit: Roger G / photo credit: Dr No, 2013] . . . are highe

. . . at close to six figures U$. Roughly a factor of 10 compared to a civilian ref 165.024. Those who collected Omega in the 'golden age' like yourself and HSTE were farsighted. Enviously, Art

. . . but only one of a ref 165.024. This one belongs to a So Cal collector who specializes in Dornblüths. Gosh, I missed the boat in a big way, didn't I? These Seamasters are out of reach now. Best, Art

. . . sandwiched by CK2913 and ref 165.024, both of which were produced in greater number. And British military to boot. A charmer, Nicolas - thanks for sharing. Best, Art

The killer Duo. Alas, I only own the CK 2913 . I would love to add the ST 165024, one day. Best, Nicolas

. . . for you and wildly jealous. Congrats on scoring one of the most desirable Omegas ever! Any details on the acquisition? Most curious, Art

A dream of a watch. Alas prices are reaching the sky. Credit photos: Analog and Shift: Best, Nicolas

. . . done deal. SM 300? Hard to justify financially with an Ultra Deep on the way. One modern diver is all I can absorb. A vintage CK 2913 (or 14755 or 165.024) or CK 2914? Yes, under the right circumstances. But I think that ship has already sailed. I h

165.024 and big triangle 166.024 Pencil or Sword

iteration of sm300 from 1964 with its specific bezel ie flat top and bottom 3, rectangular 4. they have aged in different ways