An incredible dial and patina in a 80's case. Best, Nicolas

Always my big pleasure to share my watches and thoughts here. Absolutely agree with you that the caseback relief image omission was a cost reducing decision. A minor flaw but a very nice feature of previous variant which is lost! The watch is big but a bi

Lots of very good points raised. I guess the relief Seahorse omission was a cost cutting measure, unfortunately 🤷🏻‍♂️ I was personally hoping for - and those hopes were fired up by some early reporting - that Omega decided to make the watch a tad slimmer

While my deep dives tend to happen in the office, far away from water, the number of dive watches in our household is also quite limited. They do double as quite competent skiing watches, where they see more frequent use. The Ming 18.01 H41 - their first

It was touted as a thinner, more elegant PO and unfortunately it did not become that. I find the design striking enough and a sufficient change from what went on before - so far, so good. But the watch could have been three mm thinner while offering the s

…with Ocean 2000 for company

One of the old chauvinist ads claimed that men only clean windows sized up to 40mm - so seemingly none of the current collection apply 😂 I have to say I am likewise not a fan of the size and even though I like the classical Portugieser look (and absolutel

Cheers, HSTE

The blackened versions were only produced in very, very limited quantities and are very hard to find. Cheers, HSTE

(from left to right) - IWC Ocean 2000 Bund ref. 3529 - IWC Ocean 2000 Bund ref. 3519 AMAG - IWC Ocean 2000 Bund ref. 3519 AMAG - IWC Ocean 2000 Bund ref. 3509 I keep the "rocked" one, i.e. the 3509 with the faded orange hand and the fading black bezel. Ch