White metal and blue dial give the watch a very contemporary and cool look and I understand the appeal of course (I imagine it’s the favorite combo of many collectors), but it’s not what I’m personally looking for in a watch in general and in this one in
And it's indeed slimmer and more compact than the beefier 5100. But I didn't fall in love with it when trying it on. Whereas the 5100 really impressed me. Very personal of course. Thanks for sharing your beautiful photo and have a great weekend. Best, Emm
So, I've finally been able to see Patek Philippe 's ref. 5100 in the metal, both in yellow and rose gold . I first discovered the yellow gold variant. Ref. 5100J-001 My very first reaction was: this model feels much better than the original " manta ray "
I was in fact a bit disappointed by the original Manta Ray, ref. 2554, which looked a bit dated when I had the chance to try it on. I would love to be able to compare with a 5100, which I’ve never seen in real life. I think rarest version is pt, and most
I like the "manta ray" models (2554 & 5100) much better as far as personal taste and "would-want-to-wear" is concerned. But historically and aesthetically, this quintet is quite something. I see it as some kind of ancestor of Vianney Halter's Antiqua,
If I had to decide between the 2554 or the 5100 it would be a very tough call. The simplicity of the 2554 dial and as you say the thinner profile and subtlety of the case is very appealing. My favorite of the 5100 is the white gold. Never tried one on tho
The case of Patek Philippe's ref. 2554, with its angular flared sides resembling the wings of a manta ray, hence its moniker, is one of the most sensuous I know. It was the direct source of inspiration of the later ref. 5100, made to celebrate the year 20