The focus is likely to be more on Oyster than 1908 - since the 100 year anniversary is related to the Oyster. The 1908 is not considered part of the "Oyster" line. I like how you think! Sometimes they need to do something different! Maybe they will for su

At the current state, Rolex needs to step up and introduce a higher complication. They can’t just live of-off Daytonas or GMtII’s. I was hoping for a 1908, complete or perpetual calendar. But as you said, let’s see and hope ))

far less successful than sports watches. Rolex always keeps a dress watch in its catalog: the current one is the 1908, which has its charm, but it isn't as interesting to me as the Cellini Prince. Best, Emmanuel

I tried the platinum 1908 and it didn’t speak to me…

I got to try this one on at a watch event I attended last evening. What a beautiful, well conceived reference. I absolutely loved it and would love to own one someday day.

a 1908 in for good measure.

“The marketing genius of Mr Wilsdorf and Mr Davis.” Author: kjkt3 Date: November 11, 2023 Excerpt: A brief note acknowledging the marketing brilliance of Hans Wilsdorf and Alfred Davis, posted within a lively thread on Rolex Rodeo Drive. Context: Hans Wil

Hopefully you will like the Land-Dweller 36 as I did when you get to try one on. The Sub might look ok on my wrist, but it feels chunky to me (if I ever chose a Sub, I wouldn't pick one with a "super case") and, more importantly, the aesthetic isn't that