. . . that pulls at my heartstrings: Compact 38.5 mm steel case with red gold bezel, dial furniture, and crown. List was > $13K; I've seen them private party for less than half that. Problem is it's a model I'd only get from a boutique (or dealer) with a

. . . and I came close to acquiring a SM Aqua Terra when it was introduced a dozen years ago. [photo credits: Dr No, 2013 / SM AT: Omega Boutique Woodland Hills] I would've gone for the two-tone red gold / steel version on a strap. As it happens my attent

Coffee break. Have a good week!

The Explorer not only looks much better, it’s much better built. You can feel it the moment you hold one and the other. The Explorer has a long tradition of being an excellent watch, the quintessence of solid, reliable, tried and true. The way the Explore

Rolex just has that aspect to it, it carries a greater meaning socially, whereas the Omega is unburdened and will just deliver, with a free and easy feeling! Now without the numerals and Explorer dial any of OPs could take the crown 👑 but still I don’t kn

You are considering your next GADA, and already have the bases covered for the rest of your rotation. Assume they are about the same price pre-owned. 1) Rolex Explorer I 114270, very good condition, comes complete with Rolex box, and Rolex service card da

I think so as well as it seems to be common sense between watch community. However, several years ago Omega issued the golf edition Aqua Terra. It made me confused, a dive watch is supposed to dive, and a golf watch is supposed to stay in the locker..stra

Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra GoodPlanet GMT