What is the general opinion about this reference? I don't know much about it but there is an opportunity to purchase one that is in a reasonable condition. The size is 32 mm which for my skinny wrist will be fine but I was not sure if this would be a good
Yes, you are right: 32mm seems to be thw size for a 1461. My favorite archive is saying 35 mm though. However, if you search at google.com under: patek 1461 10-200 you will be directed to an auctionhouse where you can find exactly the depicted watch.
Hi, I am very much in doubt about the size you gave! It looks like a Reference # 1461 which is a pretty small watch around 32 mm. Did you take the diameter including the winding crown or without?? BTW the winding crown looks like a non Patek replacement.
No reference number but that is not a problem.Looks like a 1461 Double stamped MAY suggest it is not an original but I cannot be sure. There is a case number and a movement number . Best bet is to get an extract from PP to confirm originality. The key sta
Closest reference number that looks like the above is ref 1461. The lugs are more tear drop shaped.Actually ref 1595 or 1571 are closer in shape. Agree that an original dial is always preferable. I was offered a SS model with a redial. Passed on that. Rat
A) Back before wristwatches became a white hot 'must have' item, prior to approximately 1990, Patek Philippe was about the only company that made perpetual calendar watches. They made about three dozen perpetual calendars per year. (I have a letter to thi
This is an interesting watch, and may very well be a rare Patek, or possibly an extravagant fake. This is one reason I enjoy collecting these older pieces - finding that rare diamond is a thrill. Without seeing the watch itself, or a photo of the movement