I always liked these gold RO Chrono 39 with the square markers. I own the steel one with white dial, but unfortunately no square indexes on steel versions. I was once very close to buy the white gold version, but negotiation with the dealer was not succes

Not bad after almost 20 years. 🥰 I got this one in 2007. It's discontinued now. A good size for me at 39 mm. I especially like the applied square markers which match the tapisserie dial. These engine cut dials were the last few batchea being made Stern Cr

Does he own a Royal Oak 14882TT in Tantalum and Steel? www.watchprozine.com / I remember he was from Colorado, had a Paul Gerber Retro Twin

Titanium... Circa year 2000. Who does remember this cool one? Best, Nicolas

I’m not against hype, but I’m not particularly for it either—it doesn’t matter that much to me. That said, I do think it’s generally a positive thing, because it likely attracts a lot of new customers. People might initially be drawn in by so-called hype

ref26051pt with calibre 5021/2819 which is a frederic piguet calibre 15

it's right for me: [Re]master02), even if I find it far too big! I completely understand your feeling, though, especially concerning the more simple versions of the RO. But the RO does nothing for me. Researching on the RO pocket watches yesterday, was ey

Two Audemars Piguet references with an 18-carat sand gold case : Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar ref. 26674SG.OO.1320SG.01 with caliber 7138 - 41 x 9.5 mm case [RE]Master02 Selfwinding ref. 15240SG.OO.A347CR.01 with caliber 7129 - 41 x 9.7 mm case Right for

collab releases with the 5691 is obvious. But they’re also related to the Pop Swatch, with its unique design allowing to pop the watch on different surrounding “containers”. But the most important for me is how beautiful the 5691 is: no date, no lume, no