And this is just a matter of taste.. I don’t like the position of the date ring and leap year position especially (it’s taking quite a central position when it’s actually not a key info practically But my main criticism is actually the empty space around

I know … you are thinking “who is he kidding”? This certainly is not a mystery watch. But to me it certainly is a mystery why this watch is relatively so unpopular. Objectively: 39.5 mm, platinum, retrograde PC, 2 backs, platinum deployant clasp, winding

Particularly surprising to me is how generally unloved 5496 is despite platinum Calatrava style case, innovative dial with raised date markers and for me me, overall beauty. I would think the retrograde function would be very popular, but it seems the opp

I also prefer the Roman numerals on these references, so 5160 or 5159 would definitely be my choice. Price wise, the 5159 is definitely a relative bargain and I hope I’ll be able to see one in person someday, as I think I would like it very much. Your 549

5159G would be my choice to buy, particularly the standard model with Roman numerals. It is a great watch and while quite expensive it is a relative bargain in today’s world of brand new Pateks. That said already owning the 5496 in platinum which I like e

But I like colored gold watches very much so it’s a great pleasure for me to see the best of both worlds united here: platinum case and rose gold hands, numerals and markers. My guess would be that this particular watch isn’t more popular because most lov

Classic Calatrava style case in platinum. Retrograde, self-winding perpetual calendar function with highly unusual and innovative raised rose gold date markers. 2 backs and winding box. From my viewpoint - a beautiful dial and overall look; a very nice si

5496 3448 5940

5940J & 5496P Calibers: 240-Q & 324-S-QR. Same complication but very different vibes and execution. Liking both equally and excellent to wear on different occasions....one more dressed up and the other one rather casually.