We have a no date (no cyclops), sub/gmt case profile, smooth bezel model. Super interesting. If it ends up being the new milgauss I'm pretty sure I'm going to love it. Hopefully it's not over 40mm.
While I do find these watches interesting, I'm not going to buy one. I don't like quartz watches and I already have a 321 in my collection. To me these are great gateway watches for kids and adults alike, but I personally don't see the value in adding one to a higher end collection, as it would chea
I'll preface this by saying that I am a huge Omega fan and I currently have two of them in my collection: a diver 300m and a modern 321. As soon as I saw the news I knew two things: 1. this decision would be a controversial one 2. I wanted a mars edition. Badly. But after thinking about it, I'm not
I own a modern 321 and I can't wait to buy one of these as soon as they become available. I can't think of anything more controversial omega could have come up with. I am not sure wether this was a good idea or not for the brand's image but I am so hyped at the same time.
Have any of you guys had the chance to try the 36mm MUT Moon? It seems perfectly sized but I'm not too sure about the proportions, because from the pictures the strap looks a little narrow compared to the case.
You could get a saxonia thin, a jules audemars, a patrimony or a calatrava for a price close to that of this watch. Plus you could get a doctor strange in steel or go for a brand like GO, GP or UN. I don't dislike the watch, it's nice, but way overpriced in my opinion, plus considering the long wait
Paying close to 20k swiss francs for a watch with a not so well finished and not so interesting vaucher movement and a dial which looks worse than what you would find on a 5196P. There are so many better and more insteresting choices for the money: Lange, Breguet, Vacheron, Patek, JLC, AP etc. which