My Posts

Rugged, yet elegant and remarkably thin for a sports watch. It's a great shame they discontinued it. I liked the version with cream dial with gold hands / indices a lot.

Love this watch. I have lent it to my father, as he finds it very easy to read.

I have a strong preference for the 1969 SeaQ and its 39.5mm size. I would have liked a longer power reserve than 40 hours, but even that might not deter me from getting one, as it is a model I strongly consider adding to my collection. We'll see.

My vintage (i.e. plexy) Rolex models spend all their time in the safe as they no longer fit my daily activities. My Explorer II 16570 is s much better fit for that, and although it's market value has been increasing, it's not at a silly level where I would think twice before going to the gym with it

It always baffles me that this watch gets so little press vs. a Daytona or a Speedmaster, considering its lineage and history. I guess it's a good thing, as they are to be found second hand at absolute bargain prices compared to what you get for the money, from a top notch brand.

Would also look great on a blue alligator strap with contrasted ecru stitching.

It has been quite some time since that happened.

No contest, in my opinion.

And I actually prefer it to the 16550 that I used to own (with black dial) because the case is thinner and sits much better on my wrist.

This one looks really good on your 5296.