patrick_y[PuristSPro Moderator]
33549
I would say that Rolex Vancouver went above the call of duty.
I would say that this store went above and beyond the call of duty. That's great. But that can't be expected be very store all the time. You yourself said you were pleasantly surprised that you weren't charged for shipping and you saw this as a "bonus." And because your watch was a vintage watch, you would expect the same treatment if it was a new watch under warranty - and new watch treatment would not be a bonus.
Again, we don't know if the watch is suffering from a warranty-covered defect. We only have the poster's opinion. It is suffering from an ALLEGED warranty defect. Also, the wording on Patek's warranty card clearly states that you need to get the watch to a Patek Philippe Service Center for the warranty defect to be evaluated. Getting the watch to a store in Miami is only half way there. The store in Miami is not capable of making the warranty defect determination - that has to be done by Patek Philippe trained watchmakers, not buy a Patek Philippe sales professional. So, you expect a jewelry store to ship and insure a watch with ALLEGED warranty defects for free to Patek Philippe Service Center in New York City? And you think this store should do this at scale - so if a hundred people asked for this, they should incur that cost?
Let's also play out the scenario. Let's say Patek Philippe Service Center says, "this problem is not a manufacturer defect, but caused by user damage or user error." You still expect the shipping to be free? If you owned this store, you'd have to call the client and say, "unfortunately we need $2000 to fix the watch and I now have to charge you $300 for shipping since I gave you free shipping based off the assumption that this watch was going to be covered under warranty." Some may lump the sum together and just say "the total is going to be $2300" but that would be very opaque.
I just don't see it as very scalable for a boutique to do it your way. But hey, our expectations differ. What really matters is what Patek Philippe has promised they will do in writing. This is obviously not the first time this has happened. And Patek Philippe has clearly said in writing that it's the consumer's obligation to get the watch to a Patek Philippe Service Center. It's clear, in black and white, on the back of the Certificate of Origin (the guarantee paperwork). Our client didn't get his watch there. He entrusted an agent to ship it to the Service Center on his behalf. That agent doesn't have to do it for free.
It'd be great if that agent did it for free. I may even expect the agent to do it for free - even before the defect was proven to be a manufacturer's defect. But maybe my expectation isn't entirely reasonable. Is my allegation that my watch is defective enough to be proof that my watch is defective? And even if I proved my watch is defective, the contractual language still doesn't say that Patek has to give me free shipping to get the watch to them.