But in the respect of those who went on the first model.
To be clear, I don't believe in the LE phenomenon, so to me, this is not a real problem, and I agree with you.
That's why I'm not disturbed by the further developments on the A II, as you and Ming stated it perfectly.
But the A II wasn't introduced with an etched crystal as a proto, and then a major change didn't happen.
Honestly, I don't think that this is what bothers all those who went on the first NSA.
Which is much more problematic is that when you say that you can't engrave the logo in big series, and that you do it first with the Spanish Edition, presenting it as an exception, and that a 2d exception happens, the owners of the first series are not happy, and I perfectly understand them.
When you own a watch, you necessarily have another point of view.
Let's imagine that you own this BH Edition with the writings on the alarm disk, and that, later, another blakc version comes with the etched crystal...
What would you think, honestly?
That been said, I repet it without problems, aesthetically speaking, and in titanium, this watch is damn nice.
My critics are not about the watch, but about the way.
I will certainly never complain to see a brand hearing its fans and passionate customers, but I don't like when it is made on others prejudice, in this case on the first owner's prejudice.
They, more than others, have the right to complain, because They OWN the watch, IMO.
Best, my friend
Nicolas