Cpt Scarlet
[Moderator - Cartier - WristScan]
38734
What’s Your Take On This ?...
Recently, I was standing outside an Omega Boutique, browsing the window and a guy (aged approximately 45) and his two friends walked up and started a discussion about watches..... “I don’t want a Rolex” he said ... “They’re for old guys and I’m not 50 yet” ... “Omega is “The” watch to have” ... He then pointed to a new Seamaster 300 and they all agreed that it was a very cool watch.
I found the conversation and the emotion that went with it interesting. My question is, do you think that after many years a shift in brand perception is gently moving in favour of Omega ?
Available on the marketplace
Review
Amanico's hands-on review of the JLC Tribute To Deep Sea Alarm. Explore its history, unique alarm complication, and comparison to vintage diver watches.
262 replies211264 views
Vintage
Uncover the true history of the Omega Speedmaster and its NASA connection. KIH's article features Omega Museum Manager Petros Protopapas, challenging common myths.
101 replies69789 views
Community
Explore the 2011 European GTG in Paris report by amanico, showcasing rare vintage watches, community spirit, and collector camaraderie.
167 replies59817 views
Vintage
Explore Omega Seamaster's collaboration with Comex, including the Seamaster 300 and PloProf 600, used in deep-sea experiments.
58 replies43766 views
Review
Explore a collector's 'on-the-wrist' review of the Omega Aqua Terra Teck Annual Calendar. Discover insights on its design, wearability, and Caliber 8601 performance.
61 replies39489 views
Collection
Discover the Omega CK 2913 Seamaster 300, a vintage diving icon. Explore its history, design, and comparison with 1950s competitors.
72 replies32946 views
What’s Your Take On This ?...
Recently, I was standing outside an Omega Boutique, browsing the window and a guy (aged approximately 45) and his two friends walked up and started a discussion about watches..... “I don’t want a Rolex” he said ... “They’re for old guys and I’m not 50 yet...
Same here... I don't buy modern Rolex models
Vintage too (scary as I am not too knowledgable), only have 16610 since 1989 and 1655 now though I don't plan to hold onto long (have had 16700, 16750, 5513 before) Reason? Hm..all my friends talk about is Rolex for 20+ years, it gets very boring to me to...
IMHO..
If there are no waiting list no premium, I think they will swing over to Rolex.. but again, after they bought the Rolex they will for sure look at Omega as second or third watches but eventually they will be wearing their Rolex more often.. hahaha of cors...
Interesting points about ...
The waiting list and premium, but I think this guy was looking at it from a different perspective. Thanks for giving us your opinion.
The old Rolex sine wave, that some of us went through.
In any case, even if they put their names down now, they will be 50 by the time they get their allocation.
Hi thanks for your thoughts on this...
It has been going on for decades but public perception can change and the conversation was an interesting insight.
Hey. You should have said hello while I was walking past 😜
Not me - but I would definitely say the same. I don’t want a Rolex 😀
The short supply of steel Rolex is changing people's perception of the brand.
When most of the space at the boutique or AD is empty, what message it conveys to the buyers? There is a preferential treatment of the valued customers at the cost of younger new customers. Therefore if they feel Rolex is for the old people, they are righ...
Hi captain,
My take is that for a number of reasons, Omega is imo indeed shifting perceptions favorably. Focusing on technical excellence - and innovation, it is imho a modern day Rolex. Workhorses featuring coaxial movements, superlative antimagnetism, longer than a...
Hi Alex...
All interesting points. I guess we all don’t like being told “no” by an AD.
Thank you for your considered reply....
You make some very good points. Omega have also been steadily refining various models and the brand image.
I think it is a couple of factors
1. Rolex is making their steel sports watches unobtainable 2. Every new generation rebels a little bit from the previous generation in taste. As many of us have delighted in watches for 20 years. New watch enthusiasts, who are part of the next generation,...
Possibly but ....
Firstly Omega offer excellent steel sports watches that don’t cost $$$$ and secondly Omega have a marketing strategy that is equally appealing to many people.
I should have stated that my comment is coming from someone in the US. This matters because when it comes to "status perception" among non-watch people here, the gap between Rolex and Omega is enormous.
Perhaps in other places around the world the gap is much closer.
Interesting topic, though it’s hard to draw any conclusions from a sample of three...
The simplest guess is they were just bragging with each other, along the lines of ‘if I dismiss Rolex then I might look like a real connoisseur in front of my friends’..You should have followed and checked if they had the same conversation again in front ...
Hi Fab....
I’m aware that three people doesn’t make a conclusive sample of the market and that’s partially why, I have raised this subject for friendly debate within our community.
Hello dear Captain! Interesting story you share and an interesting invitation to think about what the perception of public is at present. I personally feel...
... that public perception about these two prestigious brand is changing due to: 1) Rolex policy in the last few years of making their line of sport/tool steel watches unavailable to customers who visit their AD's and Boutiques and who have to search them...
Hello Abel, thank you for your thoughts...
It’s difficult to know what to add to your comments, as I think that from your personal experience of dealing with both a Rolex and Omega you have summed it up perfectly. No one can deny that Rolex make superb watches but something is definitely working f...
My big pleasure dear Captain! It is very interesting to observe the different policies of two of our most favorite brands.
Agree with you absolutely: Rolex make superb timepieces, beautifuly made and finished and so tough and reliable. Gosh! I love the brand! But I deeply deplore what they are doing with that policiy of not delivering steel tool watches at least in a moderate...
Rolex vs Omega
I also think there was a little self accreditation in the remark about Rolex which is fine. However this conversion is like the Coke/Pepsi, Ford/Chevy, Mercedes/BMW versions with both sides having very valid points. Two different marketing approaches from...
Welcome to this debate...
and generally I agree but do you think that a subtle change is happening ?
R vs O
To answer your question from my viewpoint, my main Rolex dealer is 3 miles from me and I am in there regularly. They also have the Omega brand and I do not see any shift from Rolex to Omega and the AD’s confirm this to me even with the scarcity of the ste...
Cpt, to your question......
I personally do not see the shift. The stereotype “old” Rolex is always those with fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet. I do not know of anyone who buys an Omega Seamaster or Speedmaster because the Rolex Sub or Daytona are “too old” for them. I believe Ome...
Hello S F ....
Thank you for trying to find an answer to this. I agree with your comment about Omega gaining traction in part, due to reading the market correctly and delivering the right product.
Some comments here about Rolex making SS models tough to purchase. I am actually seeing a turn in AD sentiment on SS models. More coming down the pipe.
Two things come to mind: 1) Rolex took 2 - 3 years to ramp up supply in a very measured way. and / or 2) Political unrest in Hong Kong is hurting the dodgy grey market relationships and watches destined for Hong Kong aren't going there and actually being ...
Personally, I've had and flipped short of a dozen of Omega watches in the past 10 years.
My greatest negative towards Omega is that I've had a lot of quality control issues with my pieces, probably only a couple coming clean with no notable defects. I'm talking dust under the crystal, hands alignment issues etc. I hope they were able to impro...
I won’t comment on “flipping” Rolex watches ....
But I will say that from my personal experience of buying new Omega watches, I’ve never had a single quality control problem.
I can see that
After so long of marketing by Rolex, Rolex has become mainstream which reuslts in the brand being associated with the status quo which inturn is associated with an older generation. I also think that Omega's advertising is a bit different in its focus whc...
I think Rolex successfully addresses the younger client group with its subsidiary Tudor brand.
Both price-wise and design-wise. No need for Rolex to enter into that segment if Tudor continues to perform well.
The point you about Tudor is a good one ...
But Tudor don’t currently sell watch’s in the higher price range to compete with Omega.
Thank you
I am not that knowledgeable about Rolex and so this is just what I have noticed
This notion is going on for many years...
I myself was one of this guy’s back in the day, at the beginning of this hobby. I was a huge Omega fan, and under no circumstances would wear or buy a Rolex. Now that all changed , and I just can’t like Omega... To me it’s just the feel of the watch , the...
I am Rolex guy so of course I am bias
but the fact that the three young men care to mention the brand they don't want is a Rolex tells me that is a win marketing wise for Rolex. I also suspect they will come around once they have the means.
Hi Jim, thanks for giving your opinion...
Many of us own both brands and see good points in both, I don’t think it comes down to “the means”.
I did not use the term "means" in a demeaning way
but I do feel that it applies in this instance.
Yes, I know that you didn’t ...
Use the term in a demeaning way. Thanks for making your point. It’s all in good spirit.
I think it's the response from someone who thinks they know a lot about watches.
But actually might know a little about everything. I used to be that guy 20 years ago. I felt that Rolex was for people trying to prove something and to be noticed. But after doing this for so long and owning FPJ, ALS, Patek, Panerai, Omega, Richard Mille...
Anecdotal evidence
I was standing in front of a Wempe window when a group of young boys pushed me out of the way to ogle the Rolex. I think the brand will continue to appeal to young people because it is what their idols wear and has become a symbol of having arrived. Watch...
Lots to comment on here. Rolex is for old guys? Which model? I've always thought a fancy-ed up President fits that bill but not a Sub or most other steel sport models. As far as quality
goes I don't think Rolex is or ever has been superior. Maybe the opposite if anything and with the adoption of George Daniel's co-axial excapement Omega surged ahead. That allowed Omega to extend warrantees to 5 years forcing Rolex to follow suit. In the ...
That’s great to know but ...
What’s your opinion about the subject in hand ?.... it would be great to have your opinion.
Well, I believe Omega has done a great job with developing advanced technology for their movements. Or at least they have been...
...quite successful at marketing that idea. However, Rolex has come up in the past few years with improved movements which are great at keeping time accurately. Then there is the issue of warranty which both brands have extended. All of the above in terms...
Definitely for after sale value...
BUT only for few models Rolex is a bette4 investment. However I think that a few years now Omega has improved considerably and the speedmaster and Seamaster would match the Daytona and submariner. Personally I do not liKe the “unavailability” of certain r...
I use Rolex
for work, pretty much exclusively. From personal experience, the Coaxial movement is fragile in comparison. When I'm going to be incommunicado for a few weeks, I almost always have an Explorer 2 on my wrist. ...
well no argument over that co-axial not being able to take some type of hit! But many other fine movements might not have faired well either. I will say that my few co-axials are
exceptionally accurate. More accurate than my (modern) Rollies. However you have made an excellent point and its one I have heard many times about Rolex movements. Pros and Cons to each!
Agreed
and I enjoy wearing that Speedmaster for casual use now. It's comfortable, versatile and accurate. Wasn't a hit, though, as far as I could tell at the time and I have no idea what did the damage. That said, my work is tough at times.
The Explorer is an excellent watch...
How did you manage to do that to an Omega,.. did you drop it ?
I have no idea
how that happened. No, it was not dropped. Just my usual routine wear. Admittedly, my work can get quite tough but I certainly did not knock the watch against anything any harder than normal. It was doubly unfortunate as I was seriously considering a Plop...
I still like them, I still buy them, and I enjoy wearing them.
I believe both are excellent brands and it’s all about personal taste.
Shift in the brand??
I dont know. I can tell that I dont have Rolex because there is no one (steel) that I like. However right now I am to buy an Omega.
Aqua Terra GMT Good Planet.
It was presented here by Nilomis 4 years ago. if anyone is interested his photos are superb. I was in Geneve last weekend, I saw it and... love at first sight. By the way, I am 52 years old. Cheers.
45
My age is 45. I am almost there to buy an Omega Seamaster 300. Today i ask my boss for free days, to enjoy in all rest my new purchase. No hurry, just enjoy the watch. An Omega seamaster 300 holiday. If i plan a holiday for a watch, than that watch means ...
My question was...
do you think that after many years a shift in brand perception is gently moving in favour of Omega ?
The problem with modern Omega v. Rolex is that Omega does not have many iconic, aspirational models.
There are too may iterations of the Speedmaster, and Seamaster, for that matter. The Moon watch is an icon, and aspirational at its price point. But, Rolex dominates the market in this realm of iconic, aspirational models. The shortage of stainless steel ...
True story: I was at my watchmaker's shop one day earlier this year . . .
. . . when a relatively young guy (30-ish) walked in with his wife and kid. He just needed a battery, so I said to my watchmaker, "Please take care of this gentleman first." The young man smiled, said "Thanks!", and then asked, "What's that watch you're w...
I can always rely on you Art ....
In the words of the late great Oliver Hardy.... “I have nothing to say” ...
Shifting? I don’t think so
Although I get why they were making those comments. Some people just don’t get the Rolex appeal. I’ve to admit that I’ve had quite a few Rolex in the past, from the sports models to the OP but for one reason or another could never really bond with it. The...
Hi Richard, interesting reply ....
Thanks for making your point of view on this subject. The Seamaster 300 is a great watch with a long history behind it and as you say very wearable. This doesn’t detract from the fact that Rolex makes great watches.
I have felt the same way; and also have sold off several Rolexes because of that.
I do like them: their looks, quality and reliability. But I never wear them so I don't have any now. As for the question posed by Scarlet-again, with Rolexes mostly unavailable, and with the high quality and generally fair pricing of corresponding Omegas ...
Not for one moment. Rolex steel sports is unavailable to most. You have no choice but to look at alternatives. Most would take a Rolex everytime if only to keep your money intact.
I was In Harrods last night. They receive 10-20 GMT’s per year and claim to have the largest allocation. You will need to probably spend tens of £1000’s to be considered foe one.