Trying to be as neutral as I can. I feel that I mentioned where the FIFTYSIX is imperfect, specifically citing the "safe case design" and the "[movement] is a Richemont Group movement with a flat balance spring and standard balance wheel", but I also applaud the effort VC made, the tremendous risk they took that could affect their business model, and the positive attributes to the watch.
This watch is definitely not intended for super collectors, and thus, the article is a little lost on the PuristSPro forum, a forum that appeals primarily to super collectors. But, I was just hoping that despite it's not a watch that appeals to our audience, I wanted to bring out that it was an impressive business decision on VC to take it upon themselves to make this creation!
Lastly, and while I'm not suggesting that you read other websites' views on the FIFTYSIX, almost all the other websites/blogs/news cover the FIFTYSIX with very little mention to the shortcomings this watch has from a collector's point of view. This is more or less the only article on the FIFTYSIX that goes into detail about the movement, and why it's priced this way. Every other website covers the FIFTYSIX from a "non-collector" point of view and doesn't mention the flat hair spring, the annular balance wheel, some mention it's a non-Geneva Seal movement, very few mention it's a Richemont Group movement.