WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

As per the ftc.gov link that I posted on the first page of the TRF thread...

 

[quote]

If your warranty contains a provision that restricts who has rights under the warranty, you must include a statement explaining specifically who is covered. For example, if your limited warranty is valid only for the first purchaser, your warranty must state that. Note that this applies only to limited warranties. A full warranty must cover anyone who owns the product during the period of coverage, as discussed on page 10.

If your warranty contains a provision that requires your customers to use a dispute resolution mechanism before suing under the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act for breach of warranty, you must include:

  • a statement informing consumers that they can sue under state law without first using the mechanism, but that before suing under the Magnuson-Moss Act, they must first try to resolve the dispute through the mechanism; and
  • information and materials about the dispute mechanism, including the name and address or a toll-free telephone number, or a form for filing a claim.

[endquote]

Again I reiterate that I am not in the legal profession, but in my estimation, regards the text that I have emboldened, HSWA (and Patek too, by association, if not ownership) is royally screwed!

  login to reply