Tim_M
1457
I have no problem with these decisions individually
It would be fine to go all-electric if Jaguar had proved any competence with the technology previously. This is what Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid did without any prior experience building cars.
If would be find to go (way) upmarket if Jaguar had a history of building Rolls and Bentley-level luxury machines.
It would be fine to take a gap year or two if Jaguar had a recent record of extraordinary product development ability and recent successful new model launches.
It would be fine to re-brand the company with a different logo. Because frankly, who cares? This is easy to revert if it falls flat.
The problem is that Jaguar has no experience building its own EVs (Magna built the iPace), much less any with leading-edge tech. And Jaguar had no history of selling cars that minimally rival Maybach and maximally Rolls Royce. The development money, clientele, and products in this sector exist elsewhere in each case. And Jaguar hasn't launched any new products in half a decade, so this more than gap year from a development standpoint. Finally, the logo re-branding seems easy to get right, and yet they got it wrong. Even Cadillac periodically updates its crest with little controversy and no damage done. Jag threw some great iconography out the window in exchange for something that looks like a wellness-scam celebrity cosmetics brand. Was Gwyneth Paltrow involved in this?
I'm open minded and a huge Jag fan. I want them to succeed. I want Jaguar to survive. I like EVs and would consider one from Jag. I even liked the iPace. But this is too much change too quickly from people with a bad recent track record. Part of me wishes they'd just become a center of excellence for parts, service, and preservation of past products - recent included - with occasional classic re-editions like the E-Type lightweight and wild Singer-like restomod offers for current owners.
Best,
Tim