Assuming cash funding is in place and you enjoy the model, the only reason not to would be a different watch that you enjoy more. It's not another vintage Daytona, and thank God or gods for that. Questions to ask: Have you worn a 4178? Does the size work for you? Are you rough on watches or otherwis
Don't look at the total value of the watches in relation to your net worth or net income. First, look at the watches as a hobby-experience purchases with discretionary income . You probably have a better understanding of your sustainable non-essential expense budget than the appropriate ratio of a t
This is the kind of watch that you need to view, focus, and then discern; a quick glance will not do. Of course, if you plan to read the perpetual calendar precisely, a still-higher level of effort is required. I'd compare the contrast of this AP to the post-2017 Rolex Yacht-Master II stainless stee
The sunset and sunrise complications are localized, but the rest should be fine regardless. As for the fit of the 43mm case, I found it wearable on a 16cm wrist, but anything smaller might be impractical. Best, Tim
That case is as sharp as a razor! I don't think I've ever seen a mass-market watch from that period in such a factory-fresh state. Congratulations on both your stellar taste and good fortune in finding such a specimen. Best, Tim
My experience with this model has been that it surpasses expectations. Judging solely from the frontal online images and press copy, this seemed like an insipid addition of a tourbillon where none belonged... and then I had a chance to spend some time with the model, and my view changed. The in-pers