Full disclaimer, I haven’t tried on either one. For me it’s the VC, I prefer the simple bezel versus the hobnail. That being said, not a bad problem to have 😊, and you really can’t go wrong with either 👍🏻
Here is my RG JLC , which so far has served me very well
Went to see both last week, both not available from AD. VC is easier to get. I preferred the feel of the PP, and the look on the wrist. Both beautiful watches
I'm sure the Patek guys here would argue against that, say, for the 5196 among others; but this is a perfect size and the movement was made for this case. I think it's beautiful and would be my top time-only consideration other than a Journe. Probably equ...
Full disclaimer, I haven’t tried on either one. For me it’s the VC, I prefer the simple bezel versus the hobnail. That being said, not a bad problem to have 😊, and you really can’t go wrong with either 👍🏻 Here is my RG JLC , which so far has served me ver...
I love both for their simplicity and most importantly, the movements in them. With respect to which one, it’s really a personal choice. The traditionelle is special due to its understated elegance, and the guilloche adds texture to the dial. That said, th...
For me, there is something distracting about the hobnail bezel - minute track combo of the PP. I would like it better without the minute track. The VC’s appearance is more harmonious to my tastes.
Both are solid watches and are at the best of dress watches that can also double up casually. However, I think this is not something that can easily be decided on by pictures or comments. A lot of factors come into play with the real thing - feel, weight,...
I think exceedingly highly of both, they are surely comparable in design and intent. With that said, I unmistakably prefer the VC in this comparison. It is simply even more elegant, and despite not having tried it myself, appears to have even better finis...
Both case, dial and movement/movement finish are better imho. I am biased as I own two of them, but after 9 years of ownership I still see them as impeccable
Many wise things has been written already and I would like to add that it gives me a nice feeling to wear my VC's because you very rarely see them on a wrist IRL. On the other hand I must admit that I have taken advantage of VC service a couple of times a...
For me I would choose the PP as I do prefer the case design and historical significance of the hobnail pattern. I do also have a soft spot for Patek so I might be a little biased.
Basically can't go wrong with either choice. I personally have voted for 6119 due to its more advanced caliber with 70hr power reserve and better tactile feeling on winding. As the 4400 caliber of VC has virtually not much tactile feeling upon winding. Ch...
Personally I‘d err on the side of the 6119. By a very small margin though. I like the hobnail bezel with its nod to heritage, but more importantly, I think the movement is a winner.
Historically, I did not like Patek's hobnail bezel but this reference (or my age...) changed this. I believe such pieces are to be worn for special occasions and a little bit of tasteful bling makes sense. The movement was long overdue but I consider it t...
now on the timepiece, if it is a rose gold, I'll always go for a PP over VC Tradionnelle ! (for PT case, I'll go the other way around) If I may, I would also suggest - try out two additional timepiece before you finalise...RG Laurent Ferrier Galet Classic...