Pelle_thorstenson
264
I would go for the VC
Many wise things has been written already and I would like to add that it gives me a nice feeling to wear my VC's because you very rarely see them on a wrist IRL. On the other hand I must admit that I have taken advantage of VC service a couple of times and they have never exeeded my expectations. I would rather say that they have underperformed both when it comes to keeping their time schedule as well as fixing the problem. Pelle
I’m struggling with the same decision.
Went to see both last week, both not available from AD. VC is easier to get. I preferred the feel of the PP, and the look on the wrist. Both beautiful watches
I think this Patek is possibly the best Calatrava made.
I'm sure the Patek guys here would argue against that, say, for the 5196 among others; but this is a perfect size and the movement was made for this case. I think it's beautiful and would be my top time-only consideration other than a Journe. Probably equ...
Two fantastic choices
Full disclaimer, I haven’t tried on either one. For me it’s the VC, I prefer the simple bezel versus the hobnail. That being said, not a bad problem to have 😊, and you really can’t go wrong with either 👍🏻 Here is my RG JLC , which so far has served me ver...
Thats a great piece 👍
I want only one dress watch and that should last forever and look good in the future as well, a future classic if i may say so 👍
I recently gave my opinion to a friend...
I much prefer the dial of the VC over the bezel of the PP. IMO the VC is much more elegant, especially in rose gold.
Would go with the VC. Don't like the hobnail bezel on the PP -- makes the piece too flashy and less versatile.
Also don't prefer the subdial markings on the PP.
+1 . . .
. . . not to mention the VC's engraved dial appealing on its own merits as well.
The VC dial is really nice...
...tough choice. I think the VC is just a tad more 'elegant' and the Patek a tad more 'casual' but that's not even the right word...
Personal choice
I love both for their simplicity and most importantly, the movements in them. With respect to which one, it’s really a personal choice. The traditionelle is special due to its understated elegance, and the guilloche adds texture to the dial. That said, th...
A no lose situation
For me, there is something distracting about the hobnail bezel - minute track combo of the PP. I would like it better without the minute track. The VC’s appearance is more harmonious to my tastes.
It is something you can only decide after trying both on
Both are solid watches and are at the best of dress watches that can also double up casually. However, I think this is not something that can easily be decided on by pictures or comments. A lot of factors come into play with the real thing - feel, weight,...
Thank you so much...
I know there are some great alternatives to the two pieces i have mentioned, but i would really love to stick to PP or VC
As most others here....
I think exceedingly highly of both, they are surely comparable in design and intent. With that said, I unmistakably prefer the VC in this comparison. It is simply even more elegant, and despite not having tried it myself, appears to have even better finis...
I need to read about the details again and will let you know.
Possibly Patek's modern parts in their "latest" watches colide with the PdG seal, is my first thought? But I will let you know soon
PdG requires hand finishing, Patek didn't want to spend the time and thought collectors wouldn't care about quality...
And Patek was right for most collectors.
VC for me
Both case, dial and movement/movement finish are better imho. I am biased as I own two of them, but after 9 years of ownership I still see them as impeccable
I would go for the VC
Many wise things has been written already and I would like to add that it gives me a nice feeling to wear my VC's because you very rarely see them on a wrist IRL. On the other hand I must admit that I have taken advantage of VC service a couple of times a...
I would choose the Traditionnelle in every way, although the new twin barrel movement in the 6119 is very impressive and I’m looking forward to its appearance in future Patek pieces.
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but I’ve been informed that the 38mm Traditionnelle is no longer available.
Ornate dial v ornate bezel, both of course being equally grand
For me I would choose the PP as I do prefer the case design and historical significance of the hobnail pattern. I do also have a soft spot for Patek so I might be a little biased.
I prefer VC for the more versatile and slightly sporty style
But if you want the very dressy and classic style, PP with hobnail bezel is more suitable.
That's a pleasant dilemma here, Albert.
Basically can't go wrong with either choice. I personally have voted for 6119 due to its more advanced caliber with 70hr power reserve and better tactile feeling on winding. As the 4400 caliber of VC has virtually not much tactile feeling upon winding. Ch...
This is a very tough call
Personally I‘d err on the side of the 6119. By a very small margin though. I like the hobnail bezel with its nod to heritage, but more importantly, I think the movement is a winner.
I would go with Patek
Historically, I did not like Patek's hobnail bezel but this reference (or my age...) changed this. I believe such pieces are to be worn for special occasions and a little bit of tasteful bling makes sense. The movement was long overdue but I consider it t...
If you are able to get the guilloche dial VC go for it.
I tried to buy it last year but was told that it had been discontinued. I opted for the plain dial one instead. Bonne chance!
surely an elegant dress watch is a must for a sartorial gentleman like you....
now on the timepiece, if it is a rose gold, I'll always go for a PP over VC Tradionnelle ! (for PT case, I'll go the other way around) If I may, I would also suggest - try out two additional timepiece before you finalise...RG Laurent Ferrier Galet Classic...