WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

Pay to play?

 

So this post is a serious discussion about something that absolutely infuriates me and I'm hoping it hews to the PuristS code of conduct and won't be removed.

Hodinkee put up for sale exclusively through their website a tweaked model of the VC Les Historiques chrono in SS. Nice watch. I read their post on Thursday when it went up. I have also read their numerous articles about various VC references over the past few months. Early in this past week they had a watch comparison article that featured the new VC Overseas 3-hander vs. 2 other manufacturers' references. It was a very positive take on the VC 3-hander. So I re-read it and there was no disclosure that there was a business relationship between Hodinkee and VC. There were no disclosures at all in other previous articles that included VC content. This is just unbelievably unethical in my opinion. It's shilling uncovered after the fact if a disclosure is not made.



(pic credit to Hodinkee website)

Now I know other Purists read Hodinkee, and have bought their recent Zenith watch, will wonder what's the big deal? You can argue that Everyone has the internet at their disposal and can make their own decisions and Hodinkee is doing a great favor for all of us with their 2-prong business model - free journalism and selling watches. Well thank you but you're missing the point. The point is it smells of commercial favoritism and with the size of Hodinkee's reach & influence, they can shift the balance for manufacturers that do business with them. You work with us and we pump up your sales. The VC watch collaboration alone will drive over $1.5M USD gross sales. That is substantial. I don't know the split between Hodinkee & VC, let's say 30/70. Wouldn't another manufacturer love to record that turnover to survive business in a downturn? How about Habring who makes a very nice vintage-inspired chrono? How about Parmigiani Fleurier? How about Breitling who is up for sale?

Anyway I'm just very disappointed by the biggest watch blog that it did not do the right thing once again. It just reinforces the belief that if you want independent and ethical watch journalism, you must search far & wide for it.


(post edited to insert correct image - Ornatus-Mundi)

This message has been edited by Ornatus-Mundi on 2017-02-13 07:16:48

  login to reply

Available on the marketplace