We'd really have the chops to run a well run AD! Although in NYC the costs are so great, and the market is so saturated already... There are no geographical locations left to open a franchise... Mid town has too many dealers already, downtown perhaps? And there's no high performing luxury oriented mall in downtown.
A lot of the Patek Philippe dealers in NYC don't do an especially great job, especially in the recent years. But let's say if you're a major corporate-run dealer like Tourneau/Bucherer, Patek Philippe isn't going to close your Time Machine location on 57th St. at least not anytime soon - as it would send an odd message that smaller Tourneau/Bucherer stores would still be a Patek Philippe dealer, but the largest one would cease being a Patek Philippe franchisee. But that being said, Tourneau/Bucherer is probably on high alert. But is anyone really invested? If a Bucherer regional manager loses a couple Patek Philippe franchises, what are the consequences? He retires and goes to work for a smaller company perhaps. Does he suffer? Yes, he does. But his suffering is much less financially than the cumulative of clients who have to find a new store and spend millions cumulatively to build a new relationship with those new stores. This article probably raises more questions for a critical thinker like you Jay. And just about anyone living in NYC will find it bizarre that many stores in NYC area don't fit the "prescribed criteria." These corporate stores are concerned though. Look at Tiffany & Co. Tiffany once had six Patek Philippe retailers. Now, they're down to one location. And Tiffany & Co. is the oldest dealer in the USA for Patek Philippe.