ciaca
156
The price is not necessarily insane...
"...if compared to many other high-end watches."
The matter is the DD is not an "high end" watch at all.
"I can somehow related to your points differently: I am not excited by many complications like tourbillon, chrono, grand complications so may be the DD platinum is ma final milestone!"
Of course everyone has his milestones
But, in a forum about "horology" i still prefer to debate about "horology" rather than luxury platinum bracelets.
Answering you question, anyway, i didn't mentioned complication.
Just one of the most beautiful and precious ultra thin automatic movements ever made (the 2121 inside the royal oak 15202 or the 240 inside the 5712), which is enough to make a huge difference.
Tastes, of course, are not debatable, value of the watches is
"Perhaps the beauty of some watches - like the DD platinum - is that they are indeed not for everyone and this makes it to me very special."
Here i completetly miss the point. "Not for everyone" is every watch costing a lot of money.
The difference is why it costs a lot, and how the watch is made; and in my point of view there's nothing exceptional in a DD in platinum that can explain that price. Neither the "difficulty" to manage the platinum (c'mon....
). An i watch in gold at 11k bucks is a "not for everyone" smartwatch neither, but i don't give the thing any positive sense
A watch can be "exclusive" from a lot of different points of view: rarity, price, value of how is made, ability to evaluate it, and so on.
I like the "exlusivity" of the horology, the luxury's one, which is an end in itself which has any relationship with horology, bores me.
" Now, as you know, the AP or PP nautilus still are prices as less than half than the day date so obviously it is not an entirely fair comparison."
I didn't even know the insane (imho) price of a DD in platinum. The fact the price of a 15202 it's about an half give more strength to my point. I buy a 15202 and a 5712 with the money for a DD platinum....
I've been more than fair, i guess.
Regards
This message has been edited by ciaca on 2015-03-21 07:24:55