What a post Miranda! Tough points and pictures!

Apr 07, 2018,07:51 AM
 

Being relatively new to the horo-world, I do get the point of dividing finishing quality into tiers, but I have some problems in defining what characteristics must be evaluated  and how to rate them in order to decide what movement falls into what tier. Anglage, inner angles, stripes, black mirror and so on: what makes one better than the other? Is "Swiss style" better than British ome? Do 3/4 plates hide too much of the movement or not? 


I don't have an answer, luckily DocCorson's reply gave very useful hints about comparing finishes in different tiers.

 I believe a watch is the sum of its parts (somentime even more and in that case it really sings) and the weights of the equation are totally subjective.

For instance, for me accuracy is very important, since I do not rotate watches and I don't like to set the time often. For a collector who rotates watches every day, accuracy could be of little meaning. Actually it's very difficult to know the accuracy of a watch since brands never advertise it!

Other functional paramenters should be considered, like power reserve, reliability and serviceability,. 

Overall aesthetic, brand image coherence, historical coherence are important too in a hi-end watch.

Then we should also consider the degree of innovation and design originality.

How would we rate for example a Breguet La tradition, with beautiful black mirror rotor on the back, straight bevels on the front, original design and historical appeal? Maybe tier 3 finish and... what tier for the entire watch?

Tough job indeed! 

Finally, I'd like to thank once more everyone who is contributing in making WPS such a great community! Really TOP!

Best,
Max

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Finishing has become an obsession for some, but I ask is it the Emperors new clothes?

 
 By: Miranda : April 6th, 2018-09:21
What makes for a great watch, the qualities that transcend it from being a good watch to classic, maybe even iconic, the height of desirability? I thought about this a lot, recently in the Patek forum; Nico raised a question in the debate of the finishing...  
login to reply

Thanks Miranda, one of the most intriguing posts I've read in a long time!

 
 By: brandon1 : April 6th, 2018-10:07
I need to take some time to digest but at first review I like how you've classified the different levels of finishing and framed the question of trade-offs. Looking forward to mulling this over this weekend. Thanks for taking the time for such well-struct... 
login to reply

Thank you, hope it didn't cause indigestion !! [nt]

 
 By: Miranda : April 8th, 2018-09:20
login to reply

Great post ....

 
 By: Blourenco : April 8th, 2018-15:22
These watches are only accessible to very few yet it is pertinent to describe where the aesthetic, functional and that other form of value (whatever makes you tic) comes from at its highest level of human achievement. 🧐
login to reply

Fantastic post Imran!

 
 By: sham1 : April 6th, 2018-10:37
And I am in total agreement with you apart from your saying that the 5370P is the greatest Patek since 2000 I am personally partial to the 5959 in any form but then again you are the expert in this field. Finishing in a watch for me is important but more ... 
login to reply

And so it should be

 
 By: sham1 : April 6th, 2018-10:57
bearing in mind it costs two and a half times more than the 5370P (yes I know the movement is ultra thin and an amazing technological feat for a split second) but I can never get around the fact that the 5959 costs more than quite a number of Patek minute... 
login to reply

You’ve touched on a good topic, and very well written, bravo 👍🏻👏🏻

 
 By: Clueless_Collector : April 6th, 2018-10:53
Your Tier categories are spot on and I am into Tier 2 because I’m not seeing the back of the watch 90% of the time and the longevity was my concern when I posted “what if your indie watchmaker pass?” There are definitely more than just finishing and I’m s... 
login to reply

Just as a matter of curiosity

 
 By: sham1 : April 6th, 2018-10:59
but where would you place RW Smith and the new Charles Frodsham watch in your tiers?! I have vested interest here!
login to reply

You decide...... I would be interested in your opinion

 
 By: Miranda : April 6th, 2018-11:05
...  
login to reply

Hey, that's not fair

 
 By: sham1 : April 6th, 2018-11:18
as you know more about these things than the rest of us (and especially me!!). The English style of finishing is different from the Swiss and in fact, I quite like the understatedness in RW Smith's watches with its guilded and frosted finishing. I am also... 
login to reply

Great question!

 
 By: Spangles - Dr. Tabby : April 6th, 2018-15:52
Please give us a hint as to your take Imran! And this was a phenomenal opening post you've shared, thanks!
login to reply

Much appreciated! [nt]

 
 By: Spangles - Dr. Tabby : April 8th, 2018-10:10
login to reply

You are too modest Imran

 
 By: sham1 : April 8th, 2018-11:13
and thanks for your feedback. Interesting observation!
login to reply

Very well written and spot on!

 
 By: sleepy_templar : April 6th, 2018-11:59
To me, beautiful dial ( is it also part of finishing?) contribute also an equal importance to my decision
login to reply

A lot of food for thought, my dear Imran. A lot of things to say.

 
 By: amanico : April 6th, 2018-11:12
A point you raised, which is very important to me, is the reliability, trust we can have when we'll service our champions in let"s say 10 to 15 years. As you said, who will service Independants' watches? Themselves? Will the company still exist? As for th...  
login to reply

Yep. A bygone era. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : April 8th, 2018-14:30
login to reply

Agreed! [nt]

 
 By: Francoamerican : April 6th, 2018-11:39
login to reply

Great food for thought!

 
 By: Joepny : April 6th, 2018-11:46
I am similar to you; I aspire to Tier 2 type of watches at most and am not someone who covets Tier 1 type of watches. I like complications like chronographs & moonhases and functionality much more than the movement finish. I think everyone nowadays who be... 
login to reply

This is a very thought-provoking post.

 
 By: TheMadDruid : April 6th, 2018-11:54
To me, finishing is probably the make-or-break in buying a watch (unless it's closed and inexpensive). Yet, I think I am really in the (your) tier 2/3 area when it comes to what I consider if I'm willing to spend big bucks. I would typically want more tha... 
login to reply

Yes, PLM is at the highest level. [nt]

 
 By: TheMadDruid : April 9th, 2018-05:43
login to reply

Thanks Miranda...

 
 By: DonCorson : April 6th, 2018-12:02
for your systematic approach and such well speaking pictures. I can't argue with your conclusions, but want to add what I see in those pictures. Charactoristics of Dufour and Rexhepi They are flamboyant with: - Very wide and rounded bridge beveling - Very... 
login to reply

Great post 👌🏻

 
 By: Watchonthewrists : April 6th, 2018-12:28
For me finishing is importent but also the overal look of the watch , the dail , case , markers , hands etc . A grail watch for me would be a Gronefeld , KV , GF or the new Akrivia RR Chronometre 🙏🏻
login to reply

Finishing when . . .

 
 By: Dr No : April 6th, 2018-12:24
. . . it really mattered. [Longines 30CH watch and photo credit: Steve G, posted now by previously granted permission] Back then, workmanship like this was mostly appreciated by fellow watchmakers. Today, finishing has become an end in itself, and a key m...  
login to reply

What a stunning post, content and structure wise. Thanks Miranda!

 
 By: agyzace : April 6th, 2018-12:37
Your balanced view on the key desirability parameters resonates with me too. Being able to get a watch whose mechanism was invented by the producer (e.g. Journe), while the functionality has a certain horological significance, and while the finishing is g... 
login to reply

Thanks Imran, you made it again!

 
 By: dr.kol : April 6th, 2018-12:57
For me movement finishing is important but so is case finishing, dial, relative slimness of the watch, accuracy, power reserve, etc. A great watch is a sum of different factors. Best, Kari
login to reply

Who is daily checking the finishing of his watch with a loupe?

 
 By: piccolochimico (aka dsgalaxy1) : April 6th, 2018-14:02
You summed up these general characteristics: 1.Aesthetics: it has to look beautiful to my eyes. I will be looking at the dial all day, so that in particular has to appeal to me. 2. Timekeeping: It has to be reliable and accurate- that also means serviceab...  
login to reply

I would think point 4 is the most objective: put the watch on the market and you'll find out value retention pretty quickly.

 
 By: TheMadDruid : April 6th, 2018-17:46
I like your post. It's true that finishing is enjoyed only so often, except in the mind. But beautiful finishing is indeed a real pleasure those times you do grab your loop; or take some pictures and blow them up.
login to reply

I thimk it adds to that magical sense of having something precious

 
 By: Spangles - Dr. Tabby : April 6th, 2018-18:19
Rather like Gollum, though it may sometimes feel like we live under the Misty Mountains and work with orcs, yet having something precious can add value to our lives.
login to reply

Thank you for a great comment, and I agree with you:

 
 By: Miranda : April 8th, 2018-09:38
If Journe and Chopard sell entry levels at that figure, can we set it as the standard for Tier 2? I'd think so. I also think so, but i do not think it always works this way..... which is a sad reality.
login to reply

Thanks for the great write-up.

 
 By: mj23 : April 6th, 2018-15:26
To me, it's the whole package that makes a great watch, not just the finishing. Also, different brands have their own strengths in particular areas of watchmaking and that plays into how people appreciate certain brands over others..
login to reply

Fantastic Post....

 
 By: SALMANPK : April 6th, 2018-15:38
and agree with you that there is so much more. I wrote something earlier in a different post which was along the same lines: "Its not only about anglage and perlage and Geneva stripes, thats all great but when it comes to the stuff of dreams that push bou... 
login to reply

Imran, may I ask where you would put the Credor Eichi II?

 
 By: Spangles - Dr. Tabby : April 6th, 2018-15:57
The underpart of the movement is not finished by hand, but the part you can see is pretty wow, it seems. What do you think?
login to reply

Hi Spangles...I am interested in your comment.

 
 By: CL : April 6th, 2018-17:58
Where do you get the info about the underpart of Eichi 2 movement not finished by hand? I have heard about Simplicity but never heard that about Credor Eichi. To me finishing is not exactly an important aspect of the watch I choose. Journes finishing is n... 
login to reply

One of the articles online on the eichi ii had pictures

 
 By: Spangles - Dr. Tabby : April 6th, 2018-18:12
They were at the studio where it is made. The article noted that the parts underneath are cleanly machine finished in a utilitarian way like a Rolex, with a picture to support this. As for FPJ, I have looked at my FPJs with a 10x loupe. I'm no expert, but... 
login to reply

Thanks :-)

 
 By: CL : April 6th, 2018-19:30
I will probably have my friend to ask them directly. From what I know, they actually go all the way to make sure the underneath are nicely finished too. I used to own several Simplicities, a Kari Observatoire and had also owned several Journes before. So ... 
login to reply

May I ask what article is that?

 
 By: CL : April 7th, 2018-08:09
I am interested to know more about it.
login to reply

I will look!

 
 By: Spangles - Dr. Tabby : April 7th, 2018-10:54
In the meantime, here is one with a picture of inside the movement watchesbysjx.com While here is another by sjx which show some pearlage done to dial-side parts watchesbysjx.com
login to reply

Oops, and Jackpot!

 
 By: Spangles - Dr. Tabby : April 7th, 2018-11:40
The jackpot takes care of my mistakenly double-posting a link above. Here is Mike's post from 2016 showing three good pics of inside the movement, with clean mechanical finishing: www.watchprosite.com You can see a peak of pearlage on the plate un... 
login to reply

These images only suggest that the movement underneath is not 'decorated'...

 
 By: CL : April 7th, 2018-13:30
which is rightly so since it is not necessary. Not sure about the mechanical finish though. I will double check but better not assume in this online era :P
login to reply

Sure, I imply no disapproval of this great watch!

 
 By: Spangles - Dr. Tabby : April 7th, 2018-14:02
Any info will be welcome, thanks!
login to reply

LOL... No concern

 
 By: CL : April 8th, 2018-05:54
I didn't think you were implying anything. Just curious where the info comes from as I ask fellow collectors and no one know the answer.
login to reply

I spoke to a close friend

 
 By: CL : April 8th, 2018-07:01
who is a very knowledgeable guy and had interviewed the Micro Artist watchmakers. He said they told him the put equal effort on the back of the movement, which are not seen. This was what I had heard in the past too. So I am very curious which blog or art... 
login to reply

Oh, well if you have inside info, then I'd go with that!

 
 By: Spangles - Dr. Tabby : April 8th, 2018-08:43
The finish on the plate with the spring drive quartz regulator is plain, as we've seen, but calling it machine finished may be wrong. Personally, I'm glad to have the conversation and learn more. I'd like a high-end piece for daily wear and am fond of blu... 
login to reply

Philippe Dufour certainly seems to rate Eichi II finishing very highly...

 
 By: KMII : April 6th, 2018-23:27
Almost at the same level as his own creations.
login to reply

Yes this is true [nt]

 
 By: Blourenco : April 8th, 2018-15:29
login to reply

finishing

 
 By: poseidon1964 : April 6th, 2018-19:49
i will like to add this to the most philosophical question finishing is important if it is associated with symmetry and visibility especially the wheels take for example the amagnetic movement27AM 400 you see wheels you see symmetry one of the most amazin... 
login to reply

Congratulations on a terrific choice!

 
 By: sham1 : April 6th, 2018-20:26
How long will you have to wait for the watch if I may ask?
login to reply

rexhepi

 
 By: poseidon1964 : April 6th, 2018-22:32
i hope in a year may be i will know soon poseidon
login to reply

Thanks for the info

 
 By: sham1 : April 6th, 2018-23:03
as I too am considering the watch. The longer the wait the better for me as I need to save up!!
login to reply

As always, a wonderful article, Imran.

 
 By: KIH : April 6th, 2018-20:45
A just question. Very just question and thoughts about watches. To me, Dufour Simplicity is a great one, but the finish quality is, well, my apologies in advance, really varies. My two were not so different - I would rate 8 ~ 8.5 (out of 10), but I saw an... 
login to reply

Thank you so much!!!!! [nt]

 
 By: Miranda : April 8th, 2018-09:46
login to reply

What a post Miranda! Tough points and pictures!

 
 By: maxmanzo : April 7th, 2018-07:51
Being relatively new to the horo-world, I do get the point of dividing finishing quality into tiers, but I have some problems in defining what characteristics must be evaluated and how to rate them in order to decide what movement falls into what tier. An... 
login to reply

+1! [nt]

 
 By: maxmanzo : April 8th, 2018-12:41
login to reply

Thank you indded for your inspiring post! [nt]

 
 By: maxmanzo : April 8th, 2018-12:42
login to reply

Supreme Finishers!

 
 By: mustafadurrani : April 7th, 2018-10:37
I think presently Romaine Gauthier sits at the very top in terms of finishing, and I have every reason to believe he excels in other departments, i.e. movement architecture, cases and dials, as well. He has stood the test of time along with Kari Voutilain... 
login to reply

MIranda, an incredible, true collector's post, thank you

 
 By: Mostel : April 8th, 2018-14:10
Posts like these are so nuanced and fascinating. This is what The Purists is all about. My thoughts: Voutilainen--I owned one--the finishing is not in league with Dufour. I 'knew' this the second I held the piece and turned it over. Was I disappointed? ye... 
login to reply

Thanks for articulating your take on this topic so well!

 
 By: Spangles - Dr. Tabby : April 11th, 2018-17:56
May I put to you the questions I asked Imran: -What do you think of the finishing on the Credor Eichi II, which is clearly meant to be a kind of homage to Dufour. -How do you feel about the finishing of a Roger w Smith or Frodsham? Many thanks, and apolog... 
login to reply

Fascinating question

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : April 8th, 2018-23:57
And also timely. I was chatting with Miles recently and exactly this topic came up. Miles indicated that, to him, the finishing on a watch movement is secondary to the aesthetics of the dial and the case. I was in agreement with him. However, it occured t... 
login to reply

Damn my entire collection is third tier.... 😢

 
 By: Katzky1 : April 10th, 2018-23:45
Thank God I have a stash of Grand Seiko watches to keep up appearances.
login to reply

What a great post! Very thought-provoking. I agree with most of what you shared.

 
 By: Obeezy : April 11th, 2018-05:31
Some of it though is subjective and based on one’s own sense of value, preference, etc. It is interesting that the independents are moving up the hierarchical ladder! Which I agree with! Their passion and personal inspiration comes through fantastically i... 
login to reply

Tool, toy, status symbol and object of art

 
 By: smironov : May 16th, 2024-18:30
I guess, watches are a combination/compromise of largely 4 functions - tool, toy, status symbol and object of art. Each buyer/collector subconsciously assignes his own weight to these functions when considering a watch. Depending on the weight of an objec... 
login to reply