i have strong emotional attachments to all my watches. like any relationship, these attachments get stronger or weaker over time, but with time, the weaker become stronger and vice versa. my glasshutte sport evo just caught my eye at first sight and i loved it. lately, it's doesn't grab me so much. but it will, and i couldn't sell it. and several watches that i don't wear very often still excite me when i see them. they just have a cool factor.
this is a reason, for me, why the movements and mechanical aspects are less important than the gestalt of the watch itself. it either hits me or it doesn't. and when it does, i'm smitten and i will have a connection. you mention the urwerk in the context of a question about the durability of fashion. urwerk, i think, will last because of sheer inventiveness. if i could pull it together, i'd buy anyone without hesitation because they are objets d'art. there an artistic vision behind them that commands respect. obviously, the aesthetic is what i care about, but it is the aesthetic that in the long run will also maintain the connection for me, an emotional one, and for a lot of folks, i bet. the museums can wharehouse and catalogue the mechnical advances, but for the long haul, it will take the emotional to keep me involved, and that comes from the aesthetic.
chris