Mr.Gatsby
2957
Thanks buddy :-)
Glad we are on the same page.
Best
Gatsby
+1…
By: APROchrono : January 23rd, 2022-13:43
… That was superbly put and I would second the request to the moderators to keep the post up. Not all discussions around every brand’s actions will be positive and as long as the discourse is civil, I hope this site allows us to call those out. Just my hu...
Nicely stated
By: Patekfinity : January 23rd, 2022-14:23
I believe censorship based on negativity is not conducive to a broad based discussion on this topic. There are those that question why the Arnaults decided to post the picture such as myself… Threads should not be banned simply because of criticisms. I re...
Jay…
By: Mr.Gatsby : January 23rd, 2022-19:21
I think it would be reasonable to assume that that Tiffany blue dial color was reserved for the 170th anniversary only. But then it got reinstated on the 5740 for only Bernard Arnault. And it feels as though that’s only possible because he’s the CEO of LV...
Thanks Jay
By: Mr.Gatsby : January 24th, 2022-15:14
I do agree that not all unique timepieces receive negativity from the general watch collecting public. I do personally enjoy seeing some of these watches being discussed on forums or other social media platforms. As you’ve mentioned, Patek has done so for...
This vs That
By: w220 : January 23rd, 2022-12:14
So on one hand (no pun intended), we have on the same day, CBB posting about her father's 6002, and also another post about the Tiffany 5740 piece unique. In my view, CBB's post represents everything Patek is, the Tiffany 5740 represents everything Patek ...
Just a thought,
By: Time to watch : January 24th, 2022-05:33
But isn’t removal of specific comments more favorable than deleting the whole thread? Yes censorship is always a matter for debate, but to wipe something out completely because of a few bad comments deprives everyone the opportunity to be respectfully voc...