5270 Perpetual Calendar Chronograph
I have agonised for months over the next Patek I wish to add to my collection. The 5270 in white gold is standing out for me (although the rose gold is beautiful too). At this level, one needs to consider its investment potential. The 001 released in 2011...
5970 period
if you really prefer the 5270 you should buy the 5270 but if 'loosing not too much money' must be considered too .... 5970 . end of game
Credible argument, however....
I understand there is a great debate between the 5970 vs 5270, this is my take...... Fact 1: I'm spending serious money, no doubt about it. Fact 2: I'm paying a ridiculous premium for the Patek brand because the perception is Patek is the best. Fact 3: Th...
Using the same logic....
Is the 5270 "superior" and a better "investment" than the 2499?
Touché
The 2499 is a legend that has taken decades to reach its status. It was also a rare beast and appealed to most collectors. In my opinion the perpetual chronographs are the most aesthetically pleasing and exciting complications Patek makes. Comparing the 5...
But the 2499 does not have an in-house movement
....and your logic seems to rest almost entirely on that issue. Sorry.... to me, your analysis seems contradictory
Well said.
I agree 100%. I have always wondered why the In house movements of Patek are not valued more. I went through the same thought process when choosing the 5170, for the In house movement, over the 5070 with the Lemania based movement. You articulated exactly...
Not right now
The 5270 is very weak on resale. I think the in-house movement is a big improvement, but the dial lacks the snap of the earlier models. I also think this segment of the watch market has been very hard-hit by the retraction of the watch industry worldwide....
5270G/001
The 001 was the very first in-house Patek perpetual calendar chronograph. It has a more minimalist dial than the later versions, which some of us prefer. I think it will be favored in the long run, but I'm biased, having chosen it. Park ...
Beautiful 😍
I agree with you, the 001 is special in that it's the first in-house movement, personally I see that as a big step for Patek coupled with the introduction of their seal. The 018 on the other hand is rarer and is considered the most evolved of the three. T...
I would buy 5270....
if you love it , but think of any investment returns/gains as an unlikely to happen bonus. Just as a watch collector. Best Regards Edward
The 5270G 3rd series is also my favorite version
THe 5970 and 5270 are two different things and at equal level to me as they are not to be compared but depend on the buyer's taste and choices. I made a 5270 review here if you're interested: www.watchprosite.com The dial is I think superb for som...
Great feedback
Thank you Mark for your valuable feedback, I very much enjoyed your article and I totally agree with your perspective.
It is interesting that sometimes the non-inhouse movement watches are more coveted, even though the in house movement is widely regarded as superior.
Examples that come to mind are: 5070 vs. 5170; 5970 vs. 5270 and Zenith automatic Daytona vs. Rolex movement. Maybe someday this viewpoint will flip and more people will appreciate the superior in house movement watches mentioned. Anyway, IMHO 5270 is an ...
in-house vs modified movement
I respect Patek for spending a lot of R&D resources to produce their in-house chrono movement and it is a fabulous movement indeed. However there seems to be more at play than just the movement itself when talking about people's preference for a watch as ...
My opinion is that early Chrono-Perpetuals do well...
due to being some of the first in wristwatches to market. But as you stated, it took decades for this to be realized. In the late '70s you could buy them for peanuts. I think in the decades to come that the 5270 series will hold its own and be greatly rev...