Dr No
[Moderator Omega - Wristscan]
37706
Will respectfully differ regarding the second generation . . .
. . . Ploprofs. The recent revisions are both so close aesthetically yet improved technically that they're worthy in their own right, in my humble opinion. I seriously considered a titanium model . . .
[photo credit: Dr No]
. . . when they were introduced eight years ago, but held off due to foreknowledge a revised Rail was in the works. Had I gone for the Ploprof, I probably wouldn't have been able to afford the Rail as well if it came shortly afterwards. And once Ultra Deep was introduced, the impetus to add a Ploprof dissipated.
Had there been no Rail in '17 nor UD in '22, there would likely be a titanium Ploprof in my collection now. It's that compelling personally. The essence of vintage isn't present, but the effect is largely intact.
Best,
Art
The Omega Seamaster 600 aka Ploprof early MKII configuration from 1972.
All correct configuration. The C shape case - observe the notches near the lock nut which can be seen from the top. Sandwich dial (MKII) the 600 is placed in between the Seamaster and Profession hence sandwich and prone to degrade due to the materials of ...
Love this one, Bill!
The originals all beat up look magnificent and would love one for my collection one day. In general I don't mind when brands re-make historical pieces but IMO vintage is the only way to go when considering a Ploprof.
Will respectfully differ regarding the second generation . . .
. . . Ploprofs. The recent revisions are both so close aesthetically yet improved technically that they're worthy in their own right, in my humble opinion. I seriously considered a titanium model . . . [photo credit: Dr No] . . . when they were introduced...
Wonderful Vintage 600 MK2 …
It’s good to see that this one retained its original dial and not swapped out at service. Many of the movements were also changed at service. I would love to know who ordered this technical watch in Ecuador back in 1972 and what for. For me the strap line...
