Bounce781
4731
Cheers Spangles.
Interesting point.
But true vertical integration is very rare (if not impossible) for an indie company.
Do you mean, vertical integration where EVERYTHING from straps, screws, crystals and movements is done in house?
I think that would only leave seiko and maybe Rolex?
Or do you mean vertical integration where all of the design/finishing is done in house.
I would argue, someone like HALIOS, which is a company run by 1 guy genuinely passionate about his products and designing all his watches by himself is an independent.
Certainly on a lower level to the list of indie stars regarding finishing, stock components, ETA movements, etc - but independent in spirit and direction nonetheless.
Cheers
Top Five Independent Brands?
I am curious what you guys here think or is there a general consensus what are your top 5 "Independent" brands? By top notch, I mean widely recognized and highly regarded among the independent watch collectors community, superb ( and sometimes out of this...
Journe higher
I would put Journe higher. His approach is different than the others in that he values the movement engineering quite highly relative to some that value finishing to the extreme. That is not to say that is "right or wrong" but that is his approach--and wh...
I also would rank Journe higher
I appreciate his innovation and while the finishing may not be as exquisite as some of the others it is still beautiful. It’s the combination of technical achievement and excellent finishing that impress me. With that said all the names mentioned are terr...
FP Journe is the perfect independent:
-Creative watchmaking genius makes all decisions -Small enough for the above -Yet large enough for boutiques around the world, service centers, has own watchmaking school and... -Big enough to have real vertical integration! FPJ doesn't contract out. This...
I don't think there's an agreed upon ranking
And any ranking would be highly subjective depending on what you choose to prioritize. That being said, I think there's a consensus that the current "holy trinity" of traditional watchmaking consists of Philippe Dufour, Kari Voutilainen, and Roger Smith. ...
I agree with the top three being R. Smith, Dufour and Daniels. After that, it becomes interesting! I do wonder though should Voutilainen be there?
To me, if Journe is in the top 5, I could make a valid argument to include Voutilainen. Although, I like Rexhep I think he needs to produce a bit more; however, I am confident he will take his place in the top 5 in due time. Just my thoughts!
Correct me if I am wrong
But Voutilainen doesn't make their own movements or parts? I only heard they are famous for dials.
Kari makes most of the parts for the movement in his workshop....
aside from ruby and hairspring. Also, he doesn't make his own case despite being able to, stating that his case maker is much better than he is in making cases (they make some of the best cases for chiming timepieces). This was the information I got from ...
As others have said it's highly subjective based on what one wants from the watchmaker/ brand.
In your definition of "top notch" I think you should be thinking about "and or" versus solely "and" in many cases as while it could be argued that some indies bring to the table "superb finishing" and "a reputation for remarkable timepieces" some clearly ...
Well, I think once we come to an easy consensus on the top five musicians of all time, then we can do the top 5 independent watch brands.
Obviously, the top three are Bach, Miyan Tansen, and Vilayat Khan, but after that it gets tricky...
My 5
Sarpaneva for his crazy cool aesthetic Habring2 for their sensibilities and creativity Prescher for his wizardry and beautiful design Asaoka for his ingenuity Journe as an overall package
Easier to discuss than decide
I have trouble settling on five, to be honest. It becomes an easier question if resale value is your objective proxy for overall brand strength. Dufour, Voutilainen, Journe and (Roger) Smith are sure to show up as consensus picks. Journe isn’t touching Du...
I love this game and I want to stir some controversy.
Journe, Gautier, Greubel all have silent commercial partners (AP and Chanel) - so how “truly independent” are they. For me, truly independent means there isn’t anyone else to pick up the tab or prop you up in case of low sales or negative revenues in any ...
But how do you know?
Curious how you know those on your list don't have behind the scenes investors that have a stake in the business in exchange for helping them finance operations?
That’s a good point.
I can only say, I have not discovered this to be the case and No one in our Purists community has mentioned those indies having commercial investors. Most indies do paid side consulting or design work for big companies to supplement their income (eg Paul ...
Easy to hide a big investor
No judgement hear whether it is good or bad. But given an investment in an independent by anyone may be partly motivated by the cache of said independent there is incentive to keep it under wraps. In fact, a wise thing to do would he to have a non-disclos...
I would say that independent should mean vertical integration of production
So, cross most of the names off your list! I'm glad you mentioned Ochs und Junior, though, they deserve to be in the conversation about independents.
Cheers Spangles.
Interesting point. But true vertical integration is very rare (if not impossible) for an indie company. Do you mean, vertical integration where EVERYTHING from straps, screws, crystals and movements is done in house? I think that would only leave seiko an...
Thanks!
Yes, that is what I mean, as long as we don't allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good. F.P.Journe is close to vertical integration, making movement plates, dials, cases, etc, themeselves. Jewels, hairsprings, and sapphire casebacks, okay maybe not. ...
He! He!
I did post a similar thread a few years back which has now attracted almost 17,000 views due to its interesting topic My top 5 then after a revision was: Kari Voutilainen, RW Smith, Romain Gauthier, Gronefeld and Philip Dufour As Mr Dufour hardly produces...
If you ever visited....... [nt]
Budapest And went to a very small independent... and you saw him at work, saw his tools, talked with him and his wife and ofcourse inspected his watches, you will realise Aaron Becsei (Bexei) should be in this top 5 Very, VERY small but so amazing
I am with you....Bexei!!
He is such a nice gentleman: modest and approachable but, above all, quiet. That is his biggest 'failing', little ego, no need to prove himself, just massive talent. His few watches are special, each one unique in some way. A true enthusiasts secret!! ...
There are not many but still some top Indies among which I would definitely add to your list...
Kari Voutilainen, Vianney Halter In addition to the other ones that have been already mentioned Roger Smith...
just to be sure...
PP & Rolex are independent too ;-) i think you miss Kari, Laurent Ferrier. Best, mahesh.,
Yes they are
But they are still large watch brands that churns out tens of thousands ( in Rolex case, nearly a million ) watches a year.
i don't think it matters...independents has a common behaviour...
they produce watches they think is the correct one, they don't listen/respond to market needs in general. Rolex & PP does it - they always launch something that leaves the market to look forward to 'what next' Best, mahesh.,
For me it would be very hard to choose a top five of Indie brands .
Your five brands are for sure one of the best but like others mentioned Kari V , Vianney H , H Moser , DeBethune , Urwerk , MB&F , Roger W S. And some more are amazing brands too , its all what you like and what your feeling is with a brand imho
Number ONE without any doubt is for me Gruebel Forsey
Look at their numerous inventions, patents and innovations and prestigious awards. Not a single other watchmaker has reached this level. Most are playing the card of finishing techniques or dials. GF is different in all aspects and for me the number ONE o...
GF are without a doubt in the league of their own for finishing and technology.
But, they are not indie 😀 They are trailblazers, industry leaders, horological wizards, cutting edge and important BUT at least 20% of their company is owned by AP. So, i don’t think they quite qualify as indie. But they are indisputably awesome!
Why is GF not a indie brand ? [nt]
FPJ has also sold 20% of his stock to Chanel . Still a indie brand imho . 20% isnt going to give you the power of the company to tell them which way to go i think . its Just a financial injection imo and a collab for there knowledge and knowhow
Well, I was also expressing my opinion.
But as soon as you have an investor or financial partner (1% or 20%), they get a say in how you run, what products you develop, etc. Even if they are a silent partner, they are “invested” in your success and will not look kindly to failure. GF and FPJ are...
No, FPJ is truly independent.
This is a good article to understand better: thejourneguy.com And this one: thejourneguy.com So, you see it is quite different than you might expect!
No one has mentioned Richard Mills yet.
Interesting. (For the prices they command, you’d think someone would have stuck up for them by now)
Is Journe still considered independent ?
After channel buying a stake? I know it’s a minority
If I am not wrong..
Chanel also bought a stake in Romain Gauthier. Frankly, I don't like these fashion brands having any association in Haute Horology. Kinds of cheapens it.
I would encourage you to read more about Chanel's association with FPJourne
You'll find it's not what you think. In fact, Chanel is strengthening the independence of FPJ. Further, from the very beginning, FPJ has had silent investors, something that is no secret. This move assures independence, nothing less. This is a good articl...
To my taste, Haldimann belongs in that list
in his focus on truly handmade independent watches he is right up there with Dufour and Smith although his style and focus with regard to finishing is of course very different. But he certainly hits my sweet spot ... And Vianney Halter, although I have ne...
My top 5.
1. Roger W. Smith 2. Bexei 3. Gronefeld 4. Romain Gauthier 5. Ochs und Junior.
Vincent Calabrese is number ONE
Vincent Calabrese is for me the first . He is a true genius .
Very difficult to choose only five.
We are very fortunate to have so many amazing independent watchmakers to choose from.
Independent watchmakers over independent brands.
For me, independent watchmakers as much as independent brand is important. And at a time in their careers when they "benched" their own work, which I suspect the names on the doors of many of the independent brands don't actually do anymore themselves. Th...
Fully agree with you 👍🏻🤗
To have met the watchmaker of your watch is a extra bonus for me . It gives an extra dimension and feeling to your watch Imho .
Pls share your opinion and feedback
Guys opinion needed Been looking into independent for a few months, and recently met a top collector in person. He made some suggestions so I have narrowed down my list (he was telling me to start from GPHG list) 1. Urban Jurgensen - P8 movement 2. kari v...
Harv not played in this game but as an enthusiastic supporter of the independents I would suggest that of your 3 choices I would choose an UJ only if it is an early one that was designed by Pratt. That was a truly special time for that brand. Otherwise
would shoes the Kati for quality , craftsmanship, esthetic and the man. Going off the ranch a bit look at Roger Smith as another true independent who follows George Daniels’ principles of everything possible made in-house. Note that Dufour used an off the...
Thanks
Yes I like Roger Smith 3 hands with power reserve too! Is it possible to customise it as I prefer breguet numerals which is something I don’t have in my collection.