WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

and women have only 2 feet, yet...

 

I know, but I do no buy your theory.

Would you refrain from a getting a Speedmaster 1st gen if you already own a the Seamaster and Railmaster Broad Arrow simply because it is watch nr. 11? 
There is much more to horology than wearing watches. Off course it counts, but where do you place the bar? A minimum of 100/ 25/ 10/ 2 days per annum on the wrist? Are you to order by decree that all watches need to be worn precisely by equal measure? What about sharing (more the better?), lending your watches to friends and family members, what about the simple pleasure of winding them, of looking at them? Watches come, watches go… there is no magic number. At least for me. 

As far as KV I can tell you that this particular watchmaker is completely focused on the problem of the servicing of his watch in the very long term. It is for that very reason that he refrains from using special materials, and unconventional solutions. The size of each pieces (Kari is not known for undersizing the component of his watches) and the architecture of his watches take into account future servicing. Kari is not thinking 5 or 10 years ahead but, much looooooonger. The relatively simple design of the cases and their typical lugs, both relatively easy to polish, the lack of signature on the crown, much is taking future maintenance into consideration. In fact, for KV, future maintenance does not come later… it come before any other preoccupation.

warmest
Z

  login to reply

Available on the marketplace