WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Chopard

J, F, M, A, M, J, J ...

 

is pretty straight forward to me and naturally only reflects my taste.
We see the same as well on the Lunar One, Perpetual T and the lucky ones among us on the 150 All-in-one. It actually means that Chopard continues its style line, which I do appreciate. 


I think I would struggle with months 1, 2, 3 maybe a little bit, since it's less clear what you would be looking at - day or month. Don't you think?

Furthermore, I would like to say that I find the approach of other brands using sub-dials for month indication with JAN, • , MAR, a bit less attractive, actually it's the emptiness '•' in between,
Top notch for me would be a solution that allows complete JAN, FEB, MAR like we see with models using indications on bigger diameters. 

In the end, it's all a matter of taste. wink

Steel is for sure resulting in lower price point, but the little bit less of finishing by skipping the Geneva hallmark as well. On the other side, I also like the fact of the increased hardness of steel compared to precious metals. 

Positioning this PC in the Chopard portfolio, it seems to be a complimenting reference on the principles of the 1937 for example. 

Kind regards,
Kolosstt 
This message has been edited by kolosstt on 2016-03-21 03:56:17

  login to reply