kolosstt
1455
J, F, M, A, M, J, J ...
is pretty straight forward to me and naturally only reflects my taste.
We see the same as well on the Lunar One, Perpetual T and the lucky ones among us on the 150 All-in-one. It actually means that Chopard continues its style line, which I do appreciate.
I think I would struggle with months 1, 2, 3 maybe a little bit, since it's less clear what you would be looking at - day or month. Don't you think?
Furthermore, I would like to say that I find the approach of other brands using sub-dials for month indication with JAN, • , MAR, a bit less attractive, actually it's the emptiness '•' in between,
Top notch for me would be a solution that allows complete JAN, FEB, MAR like we see with models using indications on bigger diameters.
In the end, it's all a matter of taste.
Steel is for sure resulting in lower price point, but the little bit less of finishing by skipping the Geneva hallmark as well. On the other side, I also like the fact of the increased hardness of steel compared to precious metals.
Positioning this PC in the Chopard portfolio, it seems to be a complimenting reference on the principles of the 1937 for example.
Kind regards,
Kolosstt
This message has been edited by kolosstt on 2016-03-21 03:56:17