alphabeta81
988
Agreed on both counts
My first thought was "where's the moonphase?" And my second thought was "why the labels for day month etc?"
I like it
By: cazalea : March 18th, 2016-19:34
The subtlety of the location of the date indicator (on the F) escaped me at first glance. I don't mind the labeling of the other subdials - that's cool. The only improvement I would make to this (and most perpetuals) is instead of 1 2 3 4 on the tiny LEAP...
He means that instead of the markers 1, 2, 3, 4 on the Leap Year indicator...
By: MTF : March 19th, 2016-23:54
Traditionally, the markers 1, 2, 3 and 4 indicate normal years 1 to 3 that have 28 days in February. Then in Year 4, there are 29 days. The suggestion to help people is to indicate for each year sector the actual number of days e.g. 28, 28, 28 and then 29...
I was not at the board meeting
By: MTF : March 19th, 2016-00:35
Esharp I was not at the Chopard meeting but did discuss "plans" with Mr KFS about 5 years ago. The original drivers even before a crystal ball could have predicted recent geopolitical events were: Respond to requests for a simpler, affordable perpetual ca...
Thanks, MTF
By: Esharp : March 19th, 2016-03:03
I'm sure you could tell my post was very tongue-in-cheek but on a more serious note, it's always interesting to hear something about the thought process that goes into the development of the products. Agreed re Chopard's pricing policy and that's one of s...
Not too sure of the month indices of just J, F, M, A, M, J, J, ...
By: Jester : March 18th, 2016-23:08
To me it's not exactly intuitive. Given the inscription of 'month' on the subdial, wouldn't it be better to simply indicate w/ arabic numerals then the leap year indicator w/ roman numeral? Moreover, I'm curious about motivation behind launching this new ...
J, F, M, A, M, J, J ...
By: kolosstt : March 21st, 2016-03:53
is pretty straight forward to me and naturally only reflects my taste. We see the same as well on the Lunar One, Perpetual T and the lucky ones among us on the 150 All-in-one. It actually means that Chopard continues its style line, which I do appreciate....
Awful in so many ways...
By: mdg : March 18th, 2016-23:31
...beginning with the text on the sundials and ending with the massive size. A watch this big should be waterproof down to 1,000 feet. Can't anyone other than PP make a slim, discreet perpetual anymore? Making thick watches isn't difficult, it's lazy imho...
Unknown
By: MTF : March 19th, 2016-02:52
I don't have shares nor role in the company. I assume decisions are made despite and inspite of abilities and technique, that are driven by other forces. Perhaps there is no need or purpose to subserve? You are not contentious. Its a valid question. Thank...
This is Chopard!
By: kolosstt : March 20th, 2016-05:36
For the 20th anniversary, this is a great step by an important brand. It might miss a little bit of the finishing level of the hall marked manufacture calibers. It might miss a gold rotor like found in the XPS with calibre 3.96. And some might miss a moon...